Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e'
Subir Das <subirdas21@gmail.com> Tue, 31 March 2015 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <subirdas21@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950611A1B23
for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id rDhb5eYaq5mv for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C245A1A040C
for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcxg11 with SMTP id xg11so23630934igc.0
for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=kNHnZv5uiSxJIFtVuCHBTlNDHzxt3ETE2TRihXZF7JY=;
b=JgQhH/xnTD2FHZVJT+giL0oZXjN5oqx0k7QIllS5J1RIrz0921AtoI7z+ItRMSz950
4vhB/sV55SnDi1/69CiI3O9uymLyYGmTMmtYB+zsDbeQy/+hlPdWPfQkh3eUEA4Yv8HC
BuI4HSCH+uMwhnpa6NAFyB9SRml/s48GgwSgVuFmRmiRjPVZTAnbVcdm0OULWrm3DIVY
DzeRr9ykuDnJnD1OsdPC9zDODe+ai3s7tgZ3ql33gQO+G9CDA5pcYiWQnwuBgbeo8r11
ZxaY3l6a3p///vq47RiglzXR6Jii97kKP5mgoFe+vfPl/jBRJIiZtCnaRfgOnBlB5hte
sO3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.99.66 with SMTP id cr2mr27636932icc.88.1427822394271;
Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.235.11 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <551A9161.3010403@innovationslab.net>
References: <5519C697.4040405@cox.net>
<E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849D91401@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
<551A9161.3010403@innovationslab.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:19:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFb8J8p57d4kNkQvY+1g1SxCBmED+JdyaLyH2uNzFqOhHF0dFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Subir Das <subirdas21@gmail.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5171d359cef84051298cec7
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/x8dkKh8kMzy79tT5jj8PjG0BU5Q>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e'
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode
of IEEE 802.15.4e,
and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>,
<mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>,
<mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:19:57 -0000
Agree with what Brian said here. I think 802.15.4- 2011 is more appropriate unless 802.15.4 - 2015 is published by the IEEE-SA before the RFC is published. If we choose to do 802.15.4-2015, then it would be good if WG discusses and understands the impact to IETF document(s), if there is any. -Subir On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote: > Pascal, > > On 3/31/15 2:58 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: > > Thanks a bunch Tom! > > > > I think that the case must be brought to the attention of the ADs, > > CC’ing Brian. I’m unclear what the IETF best practice is for external > > documents such as IEEE, but the IEC approach seems very well though > > through. If we do not have such a detailed BCP, then this should be > > exposed to the IAB. > > I am not aware of a BCP that discusses references to external documents. > Format-wise, that is the purview of the RFC Editor. I am not sure why > the IAB would care about references... > > I am generally leery of a blanket reference to the generic > specification. The WG has developed its solution based on a particular > version of the IEEE specification, so I would expect to see references > annotated by the year of the 15.4 spec. > > Regards, > Brian > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Pascal > > > > From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tom > > Phinney Sent: lundi 30 mars 2015 23:57 To: 6tisch@ietf.org Subject: > > Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' > > > > Dear all: > > > > I was contributing a comment on this subject via the chat channel > > when the Thursday meeting closed. Diego, who was managing the chat > > channel, captured it and we subsequently have had the attached > > exchange. > > > > In ISO and IEC standards the practice is to list the generic document > > within the list of Normative References unless there are explicit > > references to specific subclauses of the referenced document, in > > which case a specific edition needs to be called out because > > subclause numbering often change from one edition to the next. > > > > Thus, if a 6tisch document references subclause m.n.p within the new > > 2015 edition of IEEE802.15.4, the reference would be to > > IEEE802.15.4:2015, m.n.p. Otherwise the reference WITHIN the standard > > is simply to IEEE802.15.4, without qualification as to the specific > > edition. While such an unqualified reference presumes that material > > on the referenced topic will not disappear from future editions of > > IEEE802.15.4, such an assumption is almost always valid and leads to > > much less confusion by those trying to use the standard over its > > lifetime. > > > > The specific wording to cover both dated and undated references that > > the latest version of the ISO/IEC editing directives itself uses is: > > > > The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively > > referenced in this document and are indispensable for its > > application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. > > For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document > > (including any amendments) applies. > > > > The related text from the ISO/IEC editing directives with regard to > > use of Normative References is: > > > > 6.2.2 Normative references > > > > This conditional element shall give a list of the referenced > > documents cited (see 6.6.7.5) in the document in such a way as to > > make them indispensable for the application of the document. For > > dated references, each shall be given with its year of publication, > > or, in the case of enquiry or final drafts, with a dash together with > > a footnote “To be published.”, and full title. The year of > > publication or dash shall not be given for undated references. When > > an undated reference is to all parts of a document, the publication > > number shall be followed by the indication “(all parts)” and the > > general title of the series of parts (i.e. the introductory and main > > elements, see Annex E). > > > > In principle, the referenced documents shall be documents published > > by ISO and/or IEC. Documents published by other bodies may be > > referred to in a normative manner provided that a) the referenced > > document is recognized by the ISO and/or IEC committee concerned as > > having wide acceptance and authoritative status as well as being > > publicly available, b) the ISO and/or IEC committee concerned has > > obtained the agreement of the authors or publishers (where known) of > > the referenced document to its inclusion and to its being made > > available as required — the authors or publishers will be expected to > > make available such documents on request, c) the authors or > > publishers (where known) have also agreed to inform the ISO and/or > > IEC committee concerned of their intention to revise the referenced > > document and of the points the revision will concern, and d) the ISO > > and/or IEC committee concerned undertakes to review the situation in > > the light of any changes in the referenced document. > > > > The list shall be introduced by the following wording: “The following > > documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this > > document and are indispensable for its application. For dated > > references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, > > the latest edition of the referenced document (including any > > amendments) applies.” > > > > The above wording is also applicable to a part of a multipart > > document. > > > > The list shall not include the following: • referenced documents > > which are not publicly available; • referenced documents which are > > only cited in an informative manner; • referenced documents which > > have merely served as bibliographic or background material in the > > preparation of the document. > > > > Such referenced documents may be listed in a bibliography (see > > 6.4.2). > > > > An example from the same ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 document > > demonstrates proper dated-citation usage, including usage of the date > > only as necessary to reduce ambiguity: > > > > D.1.1 Scope of rules and examples provided in Annex D > > > > Annex D provides a synthesis of the rules and examples given in ISO > > 10241-1:2011, and is intended to cover those rules applicable to the > > forms of terms and definitions most commonly present in ISO and IEC > > standards. For the complete set of rules and examples, refer to ISO > > 10241-1. > > > > > > > > It seems likely that actual references to the 2015 edition of > > IEEE802.15.4 will, in fact, need to cite specific subclauses. If that > > is the case, then this entire discussion of whether or not to cite > > the edition is moot, because such citations are essential to ensure > > that any specific sublclause references actually point to relevant > > text. > > > > -Tom > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list > > 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > >
- [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Kris Pister
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Turner, Randy
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pat Kinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Tom Phinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Kris Pister
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pat Kinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Turner, Randy
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Robert Cragie
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Brian Haberman
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Brett, Patricia (PA62)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Tom Phinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Tom Phinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Jonathan Simon
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pat Kinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Subir Das
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Brian Haberman
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Kris Pister
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Subir Das
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pat Kinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Rene Struik
- [6tisch] (on effectiveness of 6TiSCH liaison) Re:… Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] (on effectiveness of 6TiSCH liaison)… Pat Kinney
- Re: [6tisch] removing the 'e' Pascal Thubert (pthubert)