IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tsch] slides for work items

"Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" <rsudhaak@cisco.com> Mon, 22 July 2013 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F5A11E8121 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsIXm7v+UmzJ for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF69D11E8120 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6872; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1374504893; x=1375714493; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=YdJLxGoyKitB64yRuBDRkOAAxT4ZtpH7qgh+ilGYit8=; b=acCv5IZFwCPbPphvVjucQePv+hwGguuUbdz8NMGK1tpPUd5hojoIPknB VFz6dcqD7oQdwVfBkogQ6ozjetkRtNFgAuQfBYITXqMytfsaGfLRhU1+v VrRSmXt6KKz5kk/Z3iXJOrn21nBpnBIs9iO1eFe9n4g012qzdK1VMQiNn g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUFAFRH7VGtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABaDoI0RDVQwDGBExZ0giQBAQEEAQEBawsSAQgRAQIBAgsdLgsUAwYIAgQOBQgTh3UMt1sEj2UgDQQHgxBuA5QGlSSCVD6CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,719,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="237826527"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2013 14:54:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6MEsn7c009493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:54:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.56]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:54:49 -0500
From: "Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
To: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Thread-Topic: [6tsch] slides for work items
Thread-Index: AQHOhutpVEzdY+jpR0m1B7XZmov+aA==
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:54:48 +0000
Message-ID: <2C3A8CAFDCAFCA41B8BF705CD9471C5B184DBF3E@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA-o6w0Vf7Yat6XQ4Za5v-mQCeEU8d-x58S2TYBTWEH0ag@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
x-originating-ip: [10.21.116.39]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2C3A8CAFDCAFCA41B8BF705CD9471C5B184DBF3Exmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] slides for work items
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:55:58 -0000

Thomas,
Thanks for the comments. I will incorporate them.

As for, comment [2], I put in the order of the charter. Can you please point out if something specific is amiss.

No problem with adapting the slides.

-raghuram

From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>>
Date: Monday, July 22, 2013 7:50 AM
To: raghuram sudhaakar <rsudhaak@cisco.com<mailto:rsudhaak@cisco.com>>
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>" <6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] slides for work items

Raghuram,

Thanks! I uploaded the slides into the repo and updated the links in the wiki.

I believe we want to stick as closely as possible to the charter.

We have elected to treat security not as a explicit work item in the charter, since it can end up being a requirements document followed by a security draft, or something which is scattered in different drafts.

The charter text now is:
"A document on the security architecture and requirements for 6TSCH will be
developed, and depending on the security requirements identified in the
document, the group may work on a security solution and ask for security area
review."

Unless we decide to change the charter text, I would keep the same "logic" in the presentation, and therefore not give the security work a work item number.

A couple of remarks:
- please change from 6TOP to 6top throughout.
- [2] I would put the work items in the order they appear in the charter.
- please note that work item 2 might change in the next couple of days, so you might have to adapt the slides.

Thomas


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak) <rsudhaak@cisco.com<mailto:rsudhaak@cisco.com>> wrote:
All,
Attached are the slides for the work items. Please provide your comments.

Specifically, please provide feedback on whether we must have the security framework as a work item.

-raghuram

_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email