Re: [6tsch] slides for work items

Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> Mon, 22 July 2013 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <twatteyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8975521E808D for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldW+ZO9Msh2I for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF8721E80B6 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id lj1so7131391pab.3 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0ONAwGw2CUINGiB9og4HnvkCb5OMCYT5R32Oggdb4E8=; b=cndE3nzYXvGJxEXAo1WkGHYArZhbKK/J/bnaQM5XN7BMk0Y6KjZxx8VwFnTDGZ7W0d znvGNV/ierP27nr9XEMyCv5xIkhXQ7zBb3p/IOrTfPJ6ETba67BZr0LxSAoDimTx/6GI lAqWD/nlvo00hJqLOF+25IDL3CMTq+YroqHrrcrRrjrzrsSSdkD+q47oxwiwolfKRpDC mgHeHTO/WE+GDgG8NNxY4W5/yKewf4kImWVAnaNXXArUbWrZYQrrnmK3a/B8IFJqm8ck aa4S7RKX5FVw8InAHHBrFnYd/od9l+nyS4uB49K2RL6F7O8KXJdf2+/M5vxb98852TQm KEXg==
X-Received: by 10.68.103.131 with SMTP id fw3mr31328516pbb.65.1374504641841; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: twatteyne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.66.147.228 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2C3A8CAFDCAFCA41B8BF705CD9471C5B184DBECC@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <2C3A8CAFDCAFCA41B8BF705CD9471C5B184DBECC@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:50:21 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: H-pmzAXZgvwjwpyji1Or4J2JFtc
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA-o6w0Vf7Yat6XQ4Za5v-mQCeEU8d-x58S2TYBTWEH0ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d99e1ebcaf604e21acc76
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] slides for work items
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:52:20 -0000

Raghuram,

Thanks! I uploaded the slides into the repo and updated the links in the
wiki.

I believe we want to stick as closely as possible to the charter.

We have elected to treat security not as a explicit work item in the
charter, since it can end up being a requirements document followed by a
security draft, or something which is scattered in different drafts.

The charter text now is:
"A document on the security architecture and requirements for 6TSCH will be
developed, and depending on the security requirements identified in the
document, the group may work on a security solution and ask for security
area
review."

Unless we decide to change the charter text, I would keep the same "logic"
in the presentation, and therefore not give the security work a work item
number.

A couple of remarks:
- please change from 6TOP to 6top throughout.
- [2] I would put the work items in the order they appear in the charter.
- please note that work item 2 might change in the next couple of days, so
you might have to adapt the slides.

Thomas


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak) <
rsudhaak@cisco.com> wrote:

>  All,
> Attached are the slides for the work items. Please provide your comments.
>
>  Specifically, please provide feedback on whether we must have the
> security framework as a work item.
>
>  -raghuram
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tsch mailing list
> 6tsch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>
>