Re: [6tsch] Mobility in 6TSCH

Alfredo Grieco <alfredo.grieco@gmail.com> Sat, 27 July 2013 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <alfredo.grieco@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B7E21F9CA8 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id od9g5NpJPUIT for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6621B21F9CA6 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ea20so2861315lab.22 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pe08g7f2L1TdE/j2y0y7iJxqt+FMZ13KOkhWdYX2OvE=; b=VJGXyZKh+1k7LfoVALj9zEC2+Bz9VR6iAvYdrsIvFkUS/elhL3LXQmR2H08HGsdMU5 OwHEwjeNf00RtRQ81yo8n/DGvSlNDsTVg+FJ9jA9PBPZDk1Qt5Mgw4xG2Ziac+qfPVkO xIw22DMOq4mfys4XMgBgxTAani6ZnCtuTm+AHVSPiUIj7JtNg7UkrRZOMX0Zb+3aU/Oy kmOtTcLxVWZ012ylAtTtZA+KMEbDpOYZWmH/XSpokugAnPjL2xfQjdkld60djLcuH+Mz GGfipgHPBB77q1n4ahND4NDqRSDgEuAEtE7kovS2Dcz2wjw0PIUmSmJDv5GRRaC4M82C FOxw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.135.99 with SMTP id pr3mr21724143lbb.23.1374912254272; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.79.103 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA8aCJwcipo6CdMQL_n_ru+QCqPTDqYXTVxKE2x5pZBqJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD8413ABB1B@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <CAAzoce4v=7m18FhJij8-H+2Di3EFcEyEY=1c18__HgVLTkf1tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADJ9OA8aCJwcipo6CdMQL_n_ru+QCqPTDqYXTVxKE2x5pZBqJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:04:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAM4EQiPSAPrftt6AM30r4YENA_vJ1huQzvVeOMnBnmKne0ea9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alfredo Grieco <alfredo.grieco@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01182dee836c2b04e279b414
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] Mobility in 6TSCH
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 08:04:16 -0000

Almost static topologies ?

Alfredo

On Saturday, July 27, 2013, Thomas Watteyne wrote:

> Pascal,
>
> I understand you are looking for the right term.
>
> Terms I can think of:
> - roaming
> - node relocation
> - occasional mobility
> - intermittent relocation
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'qinwang@berkeley.edu');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Pascal and All,
>>
>> How about "dynamic adjustment". Because,
>>
>>  In steady network (fixed location and predictable traffic load),  the
>> features of deterministic and low energy consumption have definitely been
>> provided. What we want to do is, with distributed reservation and RPL, the
>> deterministic and low energy consumption features can be extended to the
>> dynamic network (some degree of location change and/or some degree of
>> traffic load change).
>>
>> Thought?
>>
>> Qin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
>> pthubert@cisco.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'pthubert@cisco.com');>>wrote;);>>wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all;
>>>
>>> As you know, determinism and fast mobility are quite antagonistic in
>>> nature.
>>>
>>> Even with distributed routing, there are a number of issues like
>>> timeslot allocation and security context transfer or (re)establishment that
>>> will delay the mobility.
>>> In 6TSCH, we have use cases that we want to serve like the crane and the
>>> mobile handset, which require a certain degree of mobility but probably not
>>> make before break or sub-second reconnection. So we want to express that we
>>> aim at supporting this limited mobility but we do not want to raise the
>>> expectation higher than we can actually serve.
>>>
>>> The mobility term is so overloaded that it might be misleading. Would
>>> you have a suggestion for term that would be more appropriate?
>>>
>>> (I heard the terms soft, limited, and constrained so far)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Pascal
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 6tsch mailing list
>>> 6tsch@ietf.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '6tsch@ietf.org');>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6tsch mailing list
>> 6tsch@ietf.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '6tsch@ietf.org');>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>>
>>
>