IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6tsch] Fwd: [6lo] [coman] WG Review: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6lo)

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262B711E8109 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.875
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.875 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.723, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4bPktCpZLLI for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC8B11E814D for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4824; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1380304345; x=1381513945; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=7/DJL+fvVay09NgZFsZ4OIS9lUIpuM8dUioLMaNawM0=; b=GPEcgAY/vlIQ8rzEQ6a5X63DJfMMNZqy9QO8T6kVQCK/TOmUNJovUgok rDzE9vjcBcdm/N8Ta1olRguO2Nb/DbMaONlLSI/c4WDS4cJ5jIVWZdpkw 3toLMR2tFHPYE2jX3eK5sBD9tW8+AFz6CdOjXSgNw+letfuxbxr7KxU8x g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlkFAN/ERVKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABbgwc4wR6BHRZtB4ImAQEEAQEBaxsCAQwMBCsHJwsUBwoCBBOIBgy5VgSPQA0KAYMfgQEDiQGOfpF4gWaBPg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.90,994,1371081600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="265420581"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2013 17:52:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8RHqO5u002405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:52:24 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.197]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:52:23 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] [coman] WG Review: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6lo)
Thread-Index: AQHOu6k7ZxoIg5S//USFyB517EEKJZnZ3VE1
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:52:22 +0000
Message-ID: <6A45D6E7-F5FF-4464-896E-879665FF3842@cisco.com>
References: <20130923180202.32168.94377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128E75E5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <52419692.7050903@cisco.com> <20130924134921.GA19673@elstar.local> <52419C92.9040807@cisco.com> <20130926132817.GB25326@elstar.local> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128E9913@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <20130926215221.GA26059@elstar.local> <CAK=bVC-TJ1+4O+gLHTEnNqd83fuEBgMC1gN_u_xeEHN9Oi5Vig@mail.gmail.com> <20130926221814.GE26059@elstar.local> <9DD59AEB-EF1B-47B2-B81C-00E38F1534F3@tzi.org>, <5245C405.1070808@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <5245C405.1070808@acm.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6A45D6E7F5FF4464896E879665FF3842ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [6tsch] Fwd: [6lo] [coman] WG Review: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6lo)
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:52:34 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:52:34 -0000

Expéditeur: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org<mailto:nordmark@acm.org>>
Date: 27 septembre 2013 19:44:37 UTC+2
Destinataire: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org<mailto:cabo@tzi.org>>
Cc: <coman@ietf.org<mailto:coman@ietf.org>>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de<mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, 6lo WG <6lo@ietf.org<mailto:6lo@ietf.org>>
Objet: Rép : [6lo] [coman] WG Review: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6lo)

On 9/26/13 11:58 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:

OLD:
2. Related MIB modules

Hmm:
2. Related interfaces for management applications (e.g., MIB modules)

NEW:
2. Related MIB modules (including, where applicable, management data models using other established IETF management data modeling schemes).

Carsten,

*If* the WG and the IESG want the broader scope, then I'd suggest explicitly mentioning Yang models instead of the "other established ..." wording. A key question would be whether such models would cover config and operational data.

A more radical approach would be to (gasp!), only do Yang even for operational data. It is easy to map Yang to a RESTful API (see draft-bierman-netconf-yang-api) which might fit nicely with CoAP.
But not doing SMIv2 models might be too radical?

  Erik

_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org<mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email