Re: [6tsch] renaming 6tus to 6top

Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> Fri, 05 July 2013 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <twatteyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234A221F9994 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39hAf5NVqRXm for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FC521F9974 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kl14so2427380pab.20 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=OU270FtZljPWGhrYjbmUUCSz2xyr7rw3ujV3q6gaTOA=; b=fZeqPaOzYWnk92q7pc7zWs2S3xVLzlbz+E1Tk5VQPtCHSTWxWnSC1FkQdhb8+BaJ4G kVJnpIjDNBcEAPIHlfkIvmxxaS0+Myd1cnedYW+4VMp++odMf9OMqLt+o/+4XqCiSckl f9SoeFA13dOdoBm5dqfX980EpCjrIoisk93b9ty593bOQwtI8B63rWd8/lKuRqX8KVB2 5lBTTpZ9kzbfeu7kG63rF1xeXY4f+A1kWYb1P5esCRVdRi3Pfk7qUC0f0Lw79VWEmThK Rk4kWFuBgBMNqTSJp53hdCFch7MTjp5XaYfLXhPlTikH3uH19u7PcHr08Zb3A0bFA9Cl BjkA==
X-Received: by 10.66.157.68 with SMTP id wk4mr12699049pab.17.1373048373930; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: twatteyne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.66.147.228 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841352A28@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <CALEMV4YY+ZpWCyyYSpbGNKU8FT1Z+arvfwpnmd2T5tEf=CJBFA@mail.gmail.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841352A28@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:19:13 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: p6dbHv4y5Xmc4bbcZ3bXTIRUO1I
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA8z86cuCG-8_gbiC_2v+T4fRM+OOACDVEGuTCj45Xb_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86c5cc9672fa04e0c7bc2d"
Subject: Re: [6tsch] renaming 6tus to 6top
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:19:37 -0000

My 2c (NOT a strong opinion):
- 6top starts like 6tsch, which might make it easier to remember that they
are related
- 6top appear on top  on a alphabetical list

Thomas



On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

>  I do love the TOP, Xavi.****
>
> ** **
>
> But do we need the 6? I do not see that TOP has really anything to do
> with IPv6. It is actually a multiprotocol switching entity.****
>
> ** **
>
> OTOH, from the TSCH perpective, it is actually the top layer ; )****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Pascal****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* 6tsch-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6tsch-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Xavier Vilajosana Guillen
> *Sent:* vendredi 5 juillet 2013 19:26
> *To:* 6tsch@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [6tsch] renaming 6tus to 6top****
>
> ** **
>
> Dear all,
>
> after some discussion we propose to rename 6tus sublayer to 6top as "6TSCH
> Operation sub-layer".****
>
> is there any concern on that? we would like to have an agreement asap so
> we can publish new revision before the 15th of July, so please let us now
> and if there are no concerns we will rename the draft by next Tuesday.****
>
> regards,
> Xavi****
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tsch mailing list
> 6tsch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>
>