Re: [6tsch] About the special type of event to ask PCE to create a track

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Thu, 05 September 2013 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4C321E80A5 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 22:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.240, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mSB6a0OB-Yf for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 22:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF34621E80A1 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13028; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1378358945; x=1379568545; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=gBT/0/9kfTsOmjfWvvRS/V0TIvwcEnzi7DXPfL88t+M=; b=QYG3chMsQWdQeQvL70VFWWlnobxYyNTG5MwPa9CjWcS6q713IHfM4ivv BZvDCn156H6AyAUVP2Sson6FyHDH/JnG7qYpP9FM/KoRGQ5R1bOKy2HC7 XXcIEncFuz3qpXzalva/o1SLE/BXXrBSf0Qmz8xvzgbp6wU5pYfS1pNqn U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AogFAHkVKFKtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABbDoJ5NblWhzSBDYEuFnSCJQEBBAEBAWQHCxACAQg/BycLFBECBA4FiAIMujaPXAQHgx2BAAOIfY54gS+QN4JhPw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.90,844,1371081600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="255894928"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2013 05:29:04 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r855T4WN003312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 05:29:04 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.197]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 00:29:03 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu>
Thread-Topic: [6tsch] About the special type of event to ask PCE to create a track
Thread-Index: AQHOqbN6vNF3zWfNUUeZLJxljh9TZ5m2bDUAgAALNACAACbaNA==
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 05:29:03 +0000
Message-ID: <8250584A-471D-4AFB-B0EE-73C9EA3C9F41@cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841433684@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <CAAzoce6x7hNZX+GV1xcf9nyDZok2h57SjFh_AjbJXvzM=sUuzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADJ9OA-7=b2zycBcGrjOeUVzuH23ADx6Yt5a6gyPtvB7ULzYKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAzoce7OMcoydnrbo1LvHfKtwOi_4W2MMEwgp8PyVaF68hvF2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CADJ9OA9fmgmr9xFy0QM=NL4=DD4jG7=vH8i74KGoJEngXGOZaw@mail.gmail.com>, <CAAzoce6G1i=rF2Sunvu=TULVnYSVuKBXgK=-mKzwpX__5Q49Jw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAzoce6G1i=rF2Sunvu=TULVnYSVuKBXgK=-mKzwpX__5Q49Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8250584A471D4AFBB0EE73C9EA3C9F41ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>, "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] About the special type of event to ask PCE to create a track
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 05:29:10 -0000

+1

Pascal

Le 5 sept. 2013 à 00:10, "Qin Wang" <qinwang@berkeley.edu<mailto:qinwang@berkeley.edu>> a écrit :

Thomas,

I think "Flow" is a process to exchange messages for a given objective. For example, action flow consists of a Action Request from ME to 6top, and a Execution Confirm (Succ/Fail) from 6top to ME. But, "Schedule update request" looks like one step of a process. I would like to suggest that the 5th flow is called "Schedule update flow", consists of a "Schedule update request" from node to PCE, and something like "Track/cell installation" from PCE to node.

Make sense?
Qin


On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>> wrote:
I would agree that a 5th flow makes sense, especially because it allows us to use different transport mechanisms for the report flow (CoAP?) and this new flows (CoAP now? maybe PCEP later?).

Do what do we call this new flow? "Schedule update request" is a bit long.

Thomas


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu<mailto:qinwang@berkeley.edu>> wrote:
Hi Thomas,

Thanks for your explanation. You are saying the request packet from node is generated by the upper layer of 6top, correct?

If so, since the request packet is generated by upper layer of 6top, instead of 6top internal events like alarm, I think it is reasonable to add the 5th control flow.

What do you think?

Qin


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>> wrote:
Qin,

Thanks for bringing that up. Allow me to answer in Pascal's place. We are talking about the format of the packets exchanged between the ME and the nodes. In the centralized case, these are application-level packets, i.e. packet generated by an entity a couple of layer above 6top. That entity talks with the PCE over the network, and with 6top through the API (internal to the node) as defined in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-6tsch-6top-00#section-2.4.

If we agree on that, the question is whether the packet the node sends to establish a new track is part of the event flow, or not. In both cases, it would originate from this application-level entity, but possibly transported in different ways.

Thomas

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu<mailto:qinwang@berkeley.edu>> wrote:
Hi Pascal,

My understanding is that 6top is a passive role in dealing with cell/track reservation. In another word, the 6top in a node can report its state, including neighbor table, cell usage, and other statistics information, but can not make decision on if some cells/track should be added or removed, which should be the responsibility of PCE in centralized case or upper layer in distributed case. Thus, I can not see when the 5th flow will be used. Can you explain more?

Thanks
Qin


On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear all,

We discussed at the call that the(PCEP?) request to ask for a track establishment could be seen as an event, or could be a new flow.
At the call, I suggested that it could be a new, 5th flow. My arguments are that this flow:
- Probably yields different data format. The demand carries and points, end to end latency and bandwidth. That's quite specific.
- Probably yields a different flow. Events do not necessarily have a response.
- Probably uses a different transport as well (PCEP vs. CoAP)

What do you think?

Pascal
_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch


_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>

_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch




_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch


_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch