Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH
Xavier Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> Tue, 02 July 2013 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <xvilajosana@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E45D21F9DCF for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 06:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kh39-C9XScAL for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 06:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D3121F9DCC for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 06:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so12497364iec.13 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 06:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=aW7NfRGd7umCe+fgi+26WMK9H9NVLfXk/W7nV/lal/o=; b=DUvxrgTDCM3SzK+Jw6CmlhNcmgrnbPNsYbNMhXtzLYCIoZKsS6NCKsJFrFyFPfSmOa kH8tR4UH8sEVBBEwz7/5FTZehZCf1iSw3jjJBrxp/xC6pMLf/6vC9lgZAS5ztNHMwFUW kEd3L2IUpXFYwweoQV1fKbpPqa8IKYDLkOrBOjTU6UAY2ESEFdJVuQ8xe5HlfH5fjO3U FEaDnlOTnTc4KCvXcBxG6n8WXzxcuq3s4m9x7VvT11KrTz6rJe2nLi8P+vnkIKoqi/gP HqjrrYFWZuSdBPvOZy6nmjedIg41uPqrsf+35x0dXqkg28xaCQ/qXsp5yfT/ELZ7a4wR Oa2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.9.7 with SMTP id v7mr20243539iga.51.1372772164567; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 06:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.139.71 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 06:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841339CBA@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841331DAA@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841339CBA@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 06:36:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CALEMV4aFMQFn3HmR8rj1jLpniZwxP0ZbAy75Syc-qtev3Lc2Ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Xavier Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c308443a128504e0876d52"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkWjOybITl9r0hEcxvTH7dUFDIn8tNwH/7siim9axeH+dVGr7YZQpWcpwWnYjXGurQDjsIB
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:36:11 -0000
what about 6TMAN (Sixtus TSCH Management layer) 6TOP (Sixtus Track Operation Layer or Sixtus TSCH Operation Layer) MTSCH (Management TSCH sub layer) 6SUB (Sixtus SubLayer) just ideas! X On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > Dear all:**** > > ** ** > > The funniest thing I got this far is 6TSCHNTSSL, pronounced as “60 > schnitzel” (for 6TSCH TimeSlotted Sub-Layer).**** > > But seriously we need to fix this. I was thinking that the key words I’d > like to see there are:**** > > -Cell (allocation and dispatching)**** > > -Track (switching sublayer)**** > > ** ** > > So maybe 6CATS? **** > > ** ** > > Pascal**** > > ** ** > > *From:* 6tsch-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6tsch-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf > Of *Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > *Sent:* mardi 25 juin 2013 17:35 > *To:* 6tsch@ietf.org > *Subject:* [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH**** > > ** ** > > Hello Maria-Rita:**** > > ** ** > > I think we can easily beat a world record of the most ugly name. For > instance try pronouncing this: 6TSCHTSSL (for TimeSlotted Sub-Layer).**** > > ** ** > > We need advice from the list:**** > > ** ** > > 1) what do you think of the definition below for 6TSCH (I’m perfectly > happy with ità)**** > > 2) Should we rename 6TUS to avoid confusion with 6TSCH that pronounces > sixtus already? If so, proposal?**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > ** ** > > Pascal**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Maria Rita PALATTELLA [mailto:maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu<maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu>] > > *Sent:* mardi 25 juin 2013 11:08 > *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert); xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu; > yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp > *Cc:* watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu > *Subject:* RE: [6tsch] draft-ohba-6tsch-security-00**** > > ** ** > > Hello Pascal,**** > > I do agree that 6TSCH is not well defined in the terminology draft. Sorry > for that. For sure, we need to spell out the acronym. According to what > you are suggesting, and what we had before, we may update it as follows:** > ** > > ** ** > > *6TSCH: IPv6 over Time Slotted Channel Hopping. It defines a set of IETF > sublayers and protocols (for setting up a schedule with a centralized or > distributed approach, managing the resource allocation, etc.), as well as > the architecture to bind them together, for use in IPv6 TSCH based > networks.* > > ** ** > > I also agree on the confusion that comes from having 6TSCH = SIXTUS and > 6TUS adaptation layer. But I am worried it is a bit late for > changing…somehow people got already familiar with this terms…unless, we > agree to have only 6TSCH, and call 6TUS 6TSCH adaptation layer. What do you > think? Maybe it is even worst J **** > > ** ** > > Maria Rita**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > 6tsch mailing list > 6tsch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch > >
- [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Qin Wang
- Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Xavier Vilajosana Guillen
- Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Maria Rita PALATTELLA
- Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)
- Re: [6tsch] 6TUS vs. 6TSCH Thomas Watteyne