Re: [6tsch] Work item on security

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Subir and René:

The current draft charter lists only 6 work items, and then has an unnumbered paragraph as follows:
"
A document on the security architecture and requirements for 6TSCH will be
developed, and depending on the security requirements identified in the
document, the group may work on a security solution and ask for security area
review.
"

My suggestion is not to add standard track work now but to:
1) add the item above as item 7 with a sentence that is more homogeneous with 1 .. 6 and eventually
2) add words like commissioning, provisioning, key life cycle management or network / node bootstrap to indicate that these items are in scope.

What do you think?

Pascal

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Subir Das
Sent: mercredi 24 juillet 2013 15:20
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Cc: Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak); [e-mail]; Yoshihiro Ohba ([e-mail])
Subject: Re: [6tsch] Work item on security

I would agree with Rene. Let's keep the text as it is and hear from folks during BoF session if there are other suggestions. We do need to develop a security architecture and requirements document and the charter text is clear.

-Subir

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Dear all :

So far we have been pretty unclear on whether the security work would be in charter, and what the scope of that work would be.
Raghu unearthed the issue as he was working on the work item slides for the BoF.

I see the need for a security framework that describes commissioning, provisioning, key exchange and link security for large 6TSCH networks.
And that is exactly what Yoshi and the others have started with draft-ohba-6tsch-security.

Questions to the group:
Could/should we make this a full work item?
And if so, what scope exactly?

Cheers,

Pascal

_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch