Re: [6tsch] Mobility in 6TSCH

Pascal,

I understand you are looking for the right term.

Terms I can think of:
- roaming
- node relocation
- occasional mobility
- intermittent relocation

Thomas

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Hi Pascal and All,
>
> How about "dynamic adjustment". Because,
>
>  In steady network (fixed location and predictable traffic load),  the
> features of deterministic and low energy consumption have definitely been
> provided. What we want to do is, with distributed reservation and RPL, the
> deterministic and low energy consumption features can be extended to the
> dynamic network (some degree of location change and/or some degree of
> traffic load change).
>
> Thought?
>
> Qin
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
> pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all;
>>
>> As you know, determinism and fast mobility are quite antagonistic in
>> nature.
>>
>> Even with distributed routing, there are a number of issues like timeslot
>> allocation and security context transfer or (re)establishment that will
>> delay the mobility.
>> In 6TSCH, we have use cases that we want to serve like the crane and the
>> mobile handset, which require a certain degree of mobility but probably not
>> make before break or sub-second reconnection. So we want to express that we
>> aim at supporting this limited mobility but we do not want to raise the
>> expectation higher than we can actually serve.
>>
>> The mobility term is so overloaded that it might be misleading. Would you
>> have a suggestion for term that would be more appropriate?
>>
>> (I heard the terms soft, limited, and constrained so far)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Pascal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6tsch mailing list
>> 6tsch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tsch mailing list
> 6tsch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>
>