Re: [6tsch] slides for work items

I'm referring to the order in charter-ietf-6tsch-00.txt at
https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/charter-ietf-6tsch/src which is

1. "6TSCH Operation Sublayer (6top)"
2. "6TSCH centralized management"
3. "6TSCH distributed management"
4. "Minimal 6TSCH Configuration"
5. "6TSCH architecture"
6. "TSCH overview"
(no number) security architecture and requirements

Thomas

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak) <
rsudhaak@cisco.com> wrote:

>  Thomas,
> Thanks for the comments. I will incorporate them.
>
>  As for, comment [2], I put in the order of the charter. Can you please
> point out if something specific is amiss.
>
>  No problem with adapting the slides.
>
>  -raghuram
>
>   From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
> Date: Monday, July 22, 2013 7:50 AM
> To: raghuram sudhaakar <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
> Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [6tsch] slides for work items
>
>   Raghuram,
>
>  Thanks! I uploaded the slides into the repo and updated the links in the
> wiki.
>
>  I believe we want to stick as closely as possible to the charter.
>
>  We have elected to treat security not as a explicit work item in the
> charter, since it can end up being a requirements document followed by a
> security draft, or something which is scattered in different drafts.
>
>  The charter text now is:
> "A document on the security architecture and requirements for 6TSCH will be
>  developed, and depending on the security requirements identified in the
> document, the group may work on a security solution and ask for security
> area
> review."
>
>  Unless we decide to change the charter text, I would keep the same
> "logic" in the presentation, and therefore not give the security work a
> work item number.
>
>  A couple of remarks:
> - please change from 6TOP to 6top throughout.
> - [2] I would put the work items in the order they appear in the charter.
> - please note that work item 2 might change in the next couple of days, so
> you might have to adapt the slides.
>
>  Thomas
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak) <
> rsudhaak@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>  All,
>> Attached are the slides for the work items. Please provide your comments.
>>
>>  Specifically, please provide feedback on whether we must have the
>> security framework as a work item.
>>
>>  -raghuram
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6tsch mailing list
>> 6tsch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>>
>>
>