Re: [6tsch] work item 2 in the charter

Pascal,
I agree that we should keep this at the level of requirements at this
point, since there is more work than we anticipated.
Thomas

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

>  Dear all:****
>
> ** **
>
> Please review the latest draft of the charter at
> https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/charter-ietf-6tsch/src ****
>
> Now is a good time to find the bugs! ****
>
> Work Item 2 in the charter (
> https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/charter-ietf-6tsch/) is still like this:****
>
> ** **
>
> “****
>
> 2. Produce "6TSCH centralized management" to define the mechanism by which
> an****
>
> external Path Computation Entity can communicate with the 6top protocol
> layer****
>
> of the different nodes in the network (1) to modify their TSCH schedule and
> ****
>
> (2) to gather link quality statistics and data flow requirements.  The WG
> will****
>
> initially look at PCEP and CoAP.****
>
> Depending on the applicability of PCEP, this document will be targeted to*
> ***
>
> Proposed standard.****
>
> “****
>
> ** **
>
> Since the time we wrote this, we realized that there is a lot more to do
> than a simple increment to PCE/P.****
>
> ** **
>
> At the call we agreed that we should keep it to the level of requirements
> for this round. Do we all agree on this?****
>
> ** **
>
> If so we’ll need to revisit that text… Let us work on this early next
> week, this is probably the most urgent thing we have to do before the BoF.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,****
>
> ** **
>
> Pascal****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tsch mailing list
> 6tsch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>
>