Re: [6tsch] slides for work items
"Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" <rsudhaak@cisco.com> Mon, 22 July 2013 15:26 UTC
Return-Path: <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 80D6E11E80AE for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oy0etYApY-7 for
<6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D10F21E8099 for <6tsch@ietf.org>;
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com;
l=104235; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1374506782; x=1375716382;
h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version;
bh=aiGB2sXk3H6DUVro7hBy4Ay5DKKx0duqNCYJLXVwDrQ=;
b=lP4dPFSbB/J5VgVFPq+rStkvAeGmxlEuJzuXuk0+nRopKlnUJrMx1Q+5
vqhSJ55zf2H0V1DLq2opABRdiSVRsbaTMM9oz0HwGcROz+hmWEAZSDZuH
VVqWVVP0kR5VGnkftW19vvqadDKPVV6zWSRgAiODdstI8hXUZp/+Qgnm8 U=;
X-Files: slot2c-v3.pptx : 68001
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUFAO5N7VGtJXG//2dsb2JhbABaDoI0RDVQwDGBFhZ0giQBAQEEAQEBawsSAQgRAQIBAgsdCSULFAMGCAIEDgUIBg2HdQy3ZQSPZSANBAeDEG4DkBCDdpUkglQ+gio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,720,1367971200";
d="xml'?pptx'72,48,322?scan'72,48,322,208,322,72,48,145,217?rels'72,48,322,208,322,72,48,145,217?jpeg'72,48,322,208,322,72,48,145,217,145?bin'72,48,322,208,322,72,48,145,217,145,217,322";
a="234852623"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by
rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2013 15:26:21 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by
rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6MFQLoY025015
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:26:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.56]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com
([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:26:19 -0500
From: "Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
To: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Thread-Topic: [6tsch] slides for work items
Thread-Index: AQHOhu/QVEzdY+jpR0m1B7XZmov+aA==
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:26:18 +0000
Message-ID: <2C3A8CAFDCAFCA41B8BF705CD9471C5B184DBF8C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA9=y_3Qc5-eNJVzRbuM+ueYGBen6bkTVHtR9mQeHNkaZg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
x-originating-ip: [10.21.116.39]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_004_2C3A8CAFDCAFCA41B8BF705CD9471C5B184DBF8Cxmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] slides for work items
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode
of IEEE 802.15.4e,
and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>,
<mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>,
<mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:26:51 -0000
Done. It is in the below order. I have removed security arch and reqs. Other updates are also incorporated and can go into the repo. Thanks raghuram From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>> Date: Monday, July 22, 2013 7:59 AM To: raghuram sudhaakar <rsudhaak@cisco.com<mailto:rsudhaak@cisco.com>> Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>" <6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [6tsch] slides for work items I'm referring to the order in charter-ietf-6tsch-00.txt at https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/charter-ietf-6tsch/src which is 1. "6TSCH Operation Sublayer (6top)" 2. "6TSCH centralized management" 3. "6TSCH distributed management" 4. "Minimal 6TSCH Configuration" 5. "6TSCH architecture" 6. "TSCH overview" (no number) security architecture and requirements Thomas On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak) <rsudhaak@cisco.com<mailto:rsudhaak@cisco.com>> wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the comments. I will incorporate them. As for, comment [2], I put in the order of the charter. Can you please point out if something specific is amiss. No problem with adapting the slides. -raghuram From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu<mailto:watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>> Date: Monday, July 22, 2013 7:50 AM To: raghuram sudhaakar <rsudhaak@cisco.com<mailto:rsudhaak@cisco.com>> Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>" <6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [6tsch] slides for work items Raghuram, Thanks! I uploaded the slides into the repo and updated the links in the wiki. I believe we want to stick as closely as possible to the charter. We have elected to treat security not as a explicit work item in the charter, since it can end up being a requirements document followed by a security draft, or something which is scattered in different drafts. The charter text now is: "A document on the security architecture and requirements for 6TSCH will be developed, and depending on the security requirements identified in the document, the group may work on a security solution and ask for security area review." Unless we decide to change the charter text, I would keep the same "logic" in the presentation, and therefore not give the security work a work item number. A couple of remarks: - please change from 6TOP to 6top throughout. - [2] I would put the work items in the order they appear in the charter. - please note that work item 2 might change in the next couple of days, so you might have to adapt the slides. Thomas On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak) <rsudhaak@cisco.com<mailto:rsudhaak@cisco.com>> wrote: All, Attached are the slides for the work items. Please provide your comments. Specifically, please provide feedback on whether we must have the security framework as a work item. -raghuram _______________________________________________ 6tsch mailing list 6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
- [6tsch] slides for work items Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)
- Re: [6tsch] slides for work items Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tsch] slides for work items Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)
- Re: [6tsch] slides for work items Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tsch] slides for work items Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] slides for work items Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)