Re: [6tsch] work item 2 in the charter

Dear Qin:

I'm a bit out of sync.

1) I agree we shoud have mobility somewhrere
2) slide 8 in the charter slides on the repo is this " Description of Working Group [2/5]"

Is that where you'd like to see mobility mentioned?

Cheers,

Pascal

From: Qin Wang [mailto:qinwang@berkeley.edu]
Sent: vendredi 19 juillet 2013 21:12
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Cc: 6tsch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6tsch] work item 2 in the charter

Hi Pascal,

The slides are pretty good. Just a comment on slide-8. Should we add "mobility" as one of criteria?

Thanks
Qin

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear all:

Please review the latest draft of the charter at https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/charter-ietf-6tsch/src
Now is a good time to find the bugs!
Work Item 2 in the charter (https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/charter-ietf-6tsch/) is still like this:

"
2. Produce "6TSCH centralized management" to define the mechanism by which an
external Path Computation Entity can communicate with the 6top protocol layer
of the different nodes in the network (1) to modify their TSCH schedule and
(2) to gather link quality statistics and data flow requirements.  The WG will
initially look at PCEP and CoAP.
Depending on the applicability of PCEP, this document will be targeted to
Proposed standard.
"

Since the time we wrote this, we realized that there is a lot more to do than a simple increment to PCE/P.

At the call we agreed that we should keep it to the level of requirements for this round. Do we all agree on this?

If so we'll need to revisit that text... Let us work on this early next week, this is probably the most urgent thing we have to do before the BoF.

Cheers,

Pascal

_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org<mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch