Re: [6tsch] BoF Agenda & presenters
Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> Fri, 05 July 2013 22:19 UTC
Return-Path: <twatteyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8397021F9FEA for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, GB_MUTUALBENEFIT=2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0k5kO2+UKmp for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7822221F9FDB for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x11so2340398pdj.29 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=r184CZvuytLBDXuCRXyY1Ydm7OkkxD4SHJxQAFeEh3A=; b=vvOHKYncKF8QjiZRdgHyGFG5m3XtYtLjrak4lqeERX6D4fCemen00iZRavXy+eKHF0 KzbbUbwRU8ZGhr2kQWJ3fsUhroopD2+DU8Axu51uKt6yYHQKyN8UvuXZgjaqQ0vLatoZ 3ldgYB+cTZbf6k5TrRGm26WAVwTnELDRG4ZbBHt0hImkg2SfjbGiQlHYGYgYwZSAJgtz xnqkagUrsFewOROxDXp/xelIEaKaxfGyY4lRM2so33XW8XMbGiJ1USNoQ0jutZeIruc+ sfRer8AcP+KJyITPLGz6a2xi/GrZ60cVINjDpCE+VRHXIj7rDHhlxArbUnP81ICJohVT EDMw==
X-Received: by 10.68.231.200 with SMTP id ti8mr11462878pbc.46.1373062740129; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: twatteyne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.66.147.228 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9703E648-51A6-41F9-81A0-1F70BD5C8A43@gmail.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841352A0E@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <CALEMV4Z0gdgLkWrOcjF8eE4HLczH3297wa7Y1w5TZPyqAu9xvA@mail.gmail.com> <CADJ9OA-eAA2fbMVpCXrJxgboTRtiajFL=iuxLWXNMm9o7LDd7A@mail.gmail.com> <9703E648-51A6-41F9-81A0-1F70BD5C8A43@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:18:38 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 72uwrhF-XcvSK7m8kyJFkqHZbII
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA_6y66sT2QjpcP0vyTZkwYPoS+ppb3Z446iDOE3z+tXgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3398b7e13d9e04e0cb1484"
Subject: Re: [6tsch] BoF Agenda & presenters
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 22:19:02 -0000
Pascal, Makes absolute sense, thanks for the clarification. Thomas On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>wrote: > Yes and more: > > Wihart and isa100 demonstrate that we can do deterministic wireless. > Proprietary RPL variations scale to the multiple 1000s. > And there are at least 3 instances of RPL over TSCH that were developped > in parallel. > Putting it all together is technically feasible. If all parties agree on > mutual benefits 6tsch will roll 😊 > > Pascal > > Le 5 juil. 2013 à 21:19, Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> a > écrit : > > Pascal, > > Clarifying question: > > 1. background and introduction (existing work demonstrates > feasibility) 5m > > What do you mean by "existing work"? Is it synonymous to "companies are > selling networks that use IEEE802.15.4e, so it really does work"? > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Xavier Vilajosana Guillen < > xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > >> Hi all >> I can do 1.b: what is missing? (mostly the cement as opposed to the >> building blocks) 15mn >> >> and if nobody does 2.a I can do it as well but I prefer that if there is >> someone else interested just goes ahead. >> >> let me know if this is ok! >> X >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < >> pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: >> >>> Dear ML members: **** >>> >>> Now is the time when we need every good will and skill on board for a >>> successful BoF. Our objective: convince the audience that there is >>> important work to be done that does not belong to an existing group and >>> that we’ll have in this new group the people to handle the work in a >>> reasonable time frame.**** >>> >>> We need to demonstrate:**** >>> >>> - our skill. We as a group understand and have experience on all aspects >>> of the technology.**** >>> >>> - our control of the problem. No boiling the ocean, reinventing the >>> wheel, blah etc…**** >>> >>> The role of the speakers at the BoF will be critical. During the call >>> today we have isolated 9 items that we need to cover in Berlin. Now we are >>> calling for presenters for each of these items.**** >>> >>> The presenter will own a thread on his topic(s) to discuss the argument >>> he will make at the BoF. No worries, we will have the next 2 calls for >>> rehearsals. **** >>> >>> Please respond to this mail with a short summary of what you are willing >>> to take like, e.g.**** >>> >>> Thomas Watteyne: 1.d, 2.d**** >>> >>> or**** >>> >>> Pascal Thubert: 2.e**** >>> >>> Based on the following list of topics:**** >>> >>> **1. **problem statement [30min] **** >>> >>> 1. what is IEEE802.15.4e TSCH? (a key to deterministism and >>> scalability) 10mn**** >>> 2. what is missing? (mostly the cement as opposed to the building >>> blocks) 15mn**** >>> 3. Why is this a problem? (multiple proprietary solutions, >>> costly, limited scope) 3mn**** >>> 4. Status of 6TSCH group (drafts, ML audience, calls, tracking >>> with BB …) 2mn **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> 1. discussion of the charter [30min] **** >>> >>> >>> 1. background and introduction (existing work demonstrates >>> feasibility) 5mn**** >>> 2. description of WG (we have participants skilled in the >>> art) 5mn**** >>> 3. work items (we reuse as much as we can from existing IETF >>> work) 10mn**** >>> 4. non-milestone work items (we demonstrate our will to coexist >>> within regulations) 2mn**** >>> 5. external work to other WG (6MAN, PCE, ROLL?) 3mn **** >>> >>> Thanks a bunch!!!**** >>> >>> Pascal**** >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> 6tsch mailing list >>> 6tsch@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > 6tsch mailing list > 6tsch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch > >
- [6tsch] BoF Agenda & presenters Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] BoF Agenda & presenters Xavier Vilajosana Guillen
- Re: [6tsch] BoF Agenda & presenters Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tsch] BoF Agenda & presenters Pascal Thubert
- Re: [6tsch] BoF Agenda & presenters Thomas Watteyne