Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides

Dear Qin,

As far as I remember, it could be also possible to embrace other
technologies by adding on top of them 6top. No need to replace but include
other technologies.

Cheers

Alfredo

On Friday, July 19, 2013, Qin Wang wrote:

> Hi Thomas and All,
>
> The first item of problems in the slide is:
>
>       Customer dissatisfaction with competing stds
>
>       -> no device interop, double opex
>
>       -> lack of common network management
>
> What does "competing stds" refer to? Referring to existing standards like
> WirelessHart, ISA100.11a, or something else? From the statement, it may be
> derived that 6TSCH WG wants to create a common standard to replace the
> competing standards. It is not our objective, right?
>
> Maybe I misunderstand something. Please point out.
>
> Thanks
>
> Qin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Thomas Watteyne <
> watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu');>> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> FYI, I pushed the 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides we modified
>> live during the webex onto the repo. You'll find the latest version at
>> https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/meetings/src/master/130730_ietf-87_berlin
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6tsch mailing list
>> 6tsch@ietf.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '6tsch@ietf.org');>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>>
>>
>