Re: [6tsch] renaming 6tus to 6top

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sat, 06 July 2013 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6481821F9A5F for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 03:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8YwSkrhGu3WK for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 03:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x235.google.com (mail-pb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D6721F860B for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 03:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id xb12so2841821pbc.12 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 03:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kq7YwbUREmqlK0+L2Q6VreStLjfM8iB7y182xgt+K2Q=; b=Zntg870RJTgOF8flCqPEEn7gowGI5Fguwo2GVOOH/6sEVQcR9n0uW2DsYvO6JUofjy l4RQMWvwtBOR6xzb7E8ayIoYFBs4wg6ehz+aWEBVp4V5EoqjxyWDNv4yVsWSXphIwCyW 0BbWg+1LLp/fHZPjw9Cix7FxrWYJyJkCmBooJ3XY2weD90b6wWRPlqJNLu6fCywQPdOO sjmE7uwAlifgbvEpGrMET4HNVUo5keTEaShi9lu3E3OimA/Kbryepm26JGRhGrHdxZgD 2YyA7XbUy6E2z5dkIxM+PVkun/bY0NUrMZMwiQdCinhIOSRv4s59d4GovY5bQktVIbNJ /syg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.26.179 with SMTP id m19mr14666201pag.4.1373107241650; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 03:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.250.133 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 03:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALEMV4YY+ZpWCyyYSpbGNKU8FT1Z+arvfwpnmd2T5tEf=CJBFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALEMV4YY+ZpWCyyYSpbGNKU8FT1Z+arvfwpnmd2T5tEf=CJBFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:40:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-BfVTn6BTJTTMO5n4v5=5SgktvJb7hGTtqp2NzwN9f-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] renaming 6tus to 6top
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:40:42 -0000

no objection, but prefer TOPS or 6TOPS, thanks

AB

On 7/5/13, Xavier Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> after some discussion we propose to rename 6tus sublayer to 6top as "6TSCH
> Operation sub-layer".
>
> is there any concern on that? we would like to have an agreement asap so we
> can publish new revision before the 15th of July, so please let us now and
> if there are no concerns we will rename the draft by next Tuesday.
>
> regards,
> Xavi
>