IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6tsch] simulation for random schedule allocation

Xavier Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> Wed, 26 June 2013 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <xvilajosana@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0A211E8160 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bTVt5cVuYb7e for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x244.google.com (mail-ie0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::244]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55CD21F9D64 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f196.google.com with SMTP id x12so9433054ief.7 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=obGo/Py2GYvBBT7gMaBAE9W15qjr6PfjpfmQohbvX3Y=; b=M252l3GCRP7wRgKgK2RfJXYWsUbC09YnBKc3dYWNIJwU/yqKE7DizPPbSe0ZoSkwCM Q+jG0p6oDWWuSANpbkq4rQroDp2CUtZ4qKsT7hNyiJyOxis+fSmMnjmUtCwzib4Q25Mp q5lHt4Xl68Fl2HWHkiljh6HA4xfZxQ4oe+R70Yttxyl3c6L2UsEMOgxVLtQX87jfmivk 0D36g60kLErOZ7qHnA3rSy2KxWQHie7SyhjoyuQbqGYOTedo8ESrHSLaU0p0jHHmtf+z Lhf2gogfnMEHnsFvpYRFjpKSRh0TEXc2COKKCqT74h67DCyWxboRZ6oIx4cE7ObpirB2 dAfQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.21.70 with SMTP id t6mr10088589ige.36.1372206266020; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.14.231 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:24:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CALEMV4bP5PJMA5v+3kS24CyocjG8_FKC0FXGJDAP3bZ8zgKvAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Xavier Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="047d7b5d8e490b878d04e003abfc"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlNI7v342yjwYEHEnD9ET/hKimuYQq5Xx85RBZFk4wu0Gbork2ryXSaWnUYxHYvces5swvu
Subject: [6tsch] simulation for random schedule allocation
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:24:28 -0000

Dear all, I plotted some of the results in case this can help on the
discussion about probabilistic selection of slots.

Note that I am playing with a 101 * 16 schedule and trying to allocate from
few links to almost all the schedule.

This plots correspond to one of the simulated nodes (of a 50 node network)
with a high neighbour density. (the rest are quite similar and vary a
little depending on the number of neighbours they have, nothing relevant
though)

Other cases can be simulated but before I will wait for your comments and
suggestions so I spent the time on the right direction.

kind regards,

Xavi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email