Re: [6tsch] comments on Minimal 6TiSCH draft

Xavier Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> Tue, 24 September 2013 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <xvilajosana@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F083621F8C93 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BiSfFwVL79BK for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FE621F9C0D for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id rd3so4231613pab.18 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3uwQyXvGPUkoQ5+tx12JBoFIwQvCmk7bAIOuLzq/SM4=; b=Hdu3HDqzxtXIuIdCkhXXexNAC3sbUxEJ2G+eUfZOcpTBX0XS8DhkpXPjOrK6Zx1Ugy 8UNWOcG29lc6GoQ6NeGbIPMJ3qS6JWhrRhJEJEuziulBMxRYiXHp7vkBloqdk57MvfuJ QzwK2kbyG/gAjjzC/n97zhkblD4h99PG9FRtqxoeX/XATXDycfcezo9ryfGvDQdR2juq P0v0rTrPtQEHbG6r7IOi8G+dhsSWX3CoPEtvLsmXpYdk+KWivbuOscKOWNkJ/hcaRD0G d+gmTj+5E3NsaIa/9PNbbqDWNfAUH6thepUqkVzVfbSU0sdckS1PdhBoVPMduTgnofeH 9Mbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl3ydoay0rSDexJ8h7zIzBP/j8z+hm4b68kVINvg+awYDM4qmYuuAmYAFfEQl4Dx+9no72G
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.11.41 with SMTP id n9mr8020211pbb.164.1380057210207; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.34.44 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAzoce4kZpSa19DL-eDcV9B=2fMq61dxRn=gU1W0hquwj=BGrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAzoce4kZpSa19DL-eDcV9B=2fMq61dxRn=gU1W0hquwj=BGrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CALEMV4Yt42Rybn=b2PH=s9gauRMeGpNpBveyzpFMOkG==6YbeQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Xavier Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5215955c8cb3204e7279bfe
Cc: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] comments on Minimal 6TiSCH draft
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:13:39 -0000

Hi Qin,

thanks for the comments! I will review the document accordingly.
as regards to 2) I agree. I will add a setence

as regards to 1) yes, 5.1 should state the OF instead of ETX.. e.g

An example RPL objective function is the OF Zero as described in
Section 7.1 and RFC6552.


thanks!
X





On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Hi Xavi and all,
>
> I have just read the Minimal 6TiSCH draft at
> https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/draft-vilajosana-6tsch-basic/src. Here are my
> comments.
>
> Typos:
>
> (1) In section 2,  “2. Minimal schedule” => “2. Minimal schedule
> configuration”
>
> (2) In section 2.2, “has a bitmap of cell options assigned.”  => “has a
> bitmap of cell options assigned, named LinkOption.”
>
> (3) In section 3.2, “Frame and Link IE” => “Frame and Cell IE”
>
> (4) In section 5.3, “The Slot and Link IE contains the ASN and 1 Byte
> field named Join Priority.” => “The Sync IE contains the ASN and 1 Byte
> field named Join Priority.”
>
> Questions:
>
> (1) In section 5.1, ETX is a measure for calculating OF, or a OF?
>
> (2) need some sentences about how to set DAGRank to Join Priority.
>
> In IEEE802.15.4e, table 52b, Range of Join Priority is 0x0000~0x03ff. I’m
> not sure if it is a fixed range. If yes, we need to do something or say
> something in the draft.
>
> Thanks
>
> Qin
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tsch mailing list
> 6tsch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>
>