Re: [6tsch] comments on Minimal 6TiSCH draft

Hi Qin,

thanks for the comments! I will review the document accordingly.
as regards to 2) I agree. I will add a setence

as regards to 1) yes, 5.1 should state the OF instead of ETX.. e.g

An example RPL objective function is the OF Zero as described in
Section 7.1 and RFC6552.

thanks!
X

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Hi Xavi and all,
>
> I have just read the Minimal 6TiSCH draft at
> https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/draft-vilajosana-6tsch-basic/src. Here are my
> comments.
>
> Typos:
>
> (1) In section 2,  “2. Minimal schedule” => “2. Minimal schedule
> configuration”
>
> (2) In section 2.2, “has a bitmap of cell options assigned.”  => “has a
> bitmap of cell options assigned, named LinkOption.”
>
> (3) In section 3.2, “Frame and Link IE” => “Frame and Cell IE”
>
> (4) In section 5.3, “The Slot and Link IE contains the ASN and 1 Byte
> field named Join Priority.” => “The Sync IE contains the ASN and 1 Byte
> field named Join Priority.”
>
> Questions:
>
> (1) In section 5.1, ETX is a measure for calculating OF, or a OF?
>
> (2) need some sentences about how to set DAGRank to Join Priority.
>
> In IEEE802.15.4e, table 52b, Range of Join Priority is 0x0000~0x03ff. I’m
> not sure if it is a fixed range. If yes, we need to do something or say
> something in the draft.
>
> Thanks
>
> Qin
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tsch mailing list
> 6tsch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>
>