Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides
Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu> Fri, 19 July 2013 19:29 UTC
Return-Path: <qinwang@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6999F21F9A26 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l9GCQuDhRfzp for
<6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com
[209.85.223.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EB521F9A51 for
<6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w15so1874686iea.22 for
<6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com;
s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=OFGX6vszhmoMEEoeML5fIaIFyElFTmDhQlnmULYKSr0=;
b=AMFycmZ/sHz6eF/UG/KbmXOvSk+w0fC2yuO/rTgpPYbwzBXYoH7VQTUV+OSJA0+Yo5
mHxf+W8B+GZMJT6KFLbb2TA5DqV4FwLDaQ3IYKg0VJV9fGliN73z+tmCtYepoV2psCn1
FIibu1whI9DpSoTnW5/b5Kduiva+qlGw2XGfWpMqir9EH5E+TLy2/xazvx2WTFqIzg/n
n+S6Wk1DHM16GQ+D2hBFTAuYkQ+Hrm0Ed7YuH+eShIMJnjUzC7W35SkgFFMsHWPiXGxy
lsejyatPPrTRCekzqiAgcwI9tlvMCoKKfZFiCDWD8Y5vCgMLnPCd76BHa2do1lRO8P1N /mQQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.36.100 with SMTP id p4mr13116829igj.30.1374262186927;
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.54.233 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA9GpdK8BCONDVNZ-ay1d+4Jnr_ea3OKEK_X6pKubt2vEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADJ9OA9GpdK8BCONDVNZ-ay1d+4Jnr_ea3OKEK_X6pKubt2vEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:29:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAzoce5jHS16QsyE0Gs5CUQca6-oukOjLs6a1NZb=ckM7JfjOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Qin Wang <qinwang@berkeley.edu>
To: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011608e47af33b04e1e25984
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcqSwuXqNryOpWKGkgb2zK+LwuveSet+Y+ZtzU7H3t2dHdI7SxbgsLbrQP4e0B+WQ2Ey9e
Cc: 6TSCH <6tsch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode
of IEEE 802.15.4e,
and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>,
<mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>,
<mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:29:51 -0000
Hi Thomas and All,
The first item of problems in the slide is:
Customer dissatisfaction with competing stds
-> no device interop, double opex
-> lack of common network management
What does "competing stds" refer to? Referring to existing standards like
WirelessHart, ISA100.11a, or something else? From the statement, it may be
derived that 6TSCH WG wants to create a common standard to replace the
competing standards. It is not our objective, right?
Maybe I misunderstand something. Please point out.
Thanks
Qin
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Thomas Watteyne <
watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> All,
>
> FYI, I pushed the 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides we modified live
> during the webex onto the repo. You'll find the latest version at
> https://bitbucket.org/6tsch/meetings/src/master/130730_ietf-87_berlin
>
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tsch mailing list
> 6tsch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch
>
>
- [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Qin Wang
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Alfredo Grieco
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Qin Wang
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Alfredo Grieco
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Qin Wang
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Alfredo Grieco
- [6tsch] R: 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides Alfredo Grieco
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Qin Wang
- [6tsch] R: 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides Alfredo Grieco
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Qin Wang
- [6tsch] R: 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slides Alfredo Grieco
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Qin Wang
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Qin Wang
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Kris Pister
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Kris Pister
- Re: [6tsch] 1c "Why is this a problem? " BoF slid… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)