[71attendees] US mint -- no camera in your backpack
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 10 March 2008 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2367D28C375; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0qcrG6cD4AA; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8CE3A6971; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0893A6971 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TMIWHnoD2FTs for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1072228C3A0 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 10:48:15 -0700
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2AHmEmr021725 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:48:14 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.21.87.40]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m2AHmELh024682 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:48:14 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 71attendees@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:48:13 -0400
Message-ID: <0de601c882d6$ea48a220$7d00470a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AciC1unKwN/mcT/2SAe264JgISbA/w==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=568; t=1205171294; x=1206035294; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20US=20mint=20--=20no=20camera=20in=20your=20back pack |Sender:=20; bh=JFJaRvZnyokUtq+PZhvDAd8RRdHGno+jZs80I46ryzY=; b=iMnL7Vsg4SaiBTV9o/TLG9q7KxzsQOfhEKBgr3F5yqytdtZPezjWIGJvjP mNeKl7VtPxDJvWJAY+hfcZetgOf6jqekAy0DYho0GlACLjdgqgcRBb5OU7fD 0mHpbzQc9v;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Subject: [71attendees] US mint -- no camera in your backpack
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
My wife just informed me that the US mint's (antiquated) anti-camera policy means no cameras allowed into the building whatsoever, even inside of your backpack. They also have no provision to check your backpack; everyone is left with the option of 'hiding' their camera outside the building somewhere or going to a museum two blocks away, paying their $15 admission, and checking a bag with that museum. Why do I say it's an antiquated rule? Because they allow mobile telephones into the building, including mobile telephones with build-in cameras. -d _______________________________________________ 71attendees mailing list 71attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees