Re: [71attendees] [Geopriv] GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71

"Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com> Mon, 14 April 2008 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 71attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1835928C388; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC0028C2F6; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.192, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8xTnORnBi+O; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from andrew.com (smtp3.andrew.com [198.135.207.235]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B5428C394; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_910__2008_04_14_17_00_31
X-SEF-16EBA1E9-99E8-4E1D-A1CA-4971F5510AF: 1
Received: from aopexbh2.andrew.com [10.86.20.25] by smtp3.andrew.com - SurfControl E-mail Filter (5.2.1); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:00:31 -0500
Received: from AHQEX1.andrew.com ([10.86.20.21]) by aopexbh2.andrew.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:47:05 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:46:12 -0500
Message-ID: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF157C726@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [71attendees] [Geopriv] GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71
Thread-Index: AcieVw+8WYcHSRYoSzmNDb4riSH5pwAIeV+v
References: <47D5FBD0.70008@bbn.com><f77644530804040552s2b0d06fbl8925ad6d391e609a@mail.gmail.com><E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF157C70E@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <fe9f45350804110158qf4d2ae8nd0e339bec2efeb66@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
To: "Alberto Ballauri" <tesi.ballauri.sacco@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2008 21:47:05.0010 (UTC) FILETIME=[145F9920:01C89E79]
Cc: GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] [Geopriv] GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Alberto,

As I have now said 3 times, please take these questions to the source forge HELD forum.
I will not be answering emails sent to this list regarding this topic.

Cheers
James



-----Original Message-----
From: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Alberto Ballauri
Sent: Fri 4/11/2008 3:58 AM
To: Winterbottom, James
Cc: GEOPRIV; Richard Barnes; 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] [Geopriv] GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71
 
Hi James,
We have some philosophical questions about the LIS and the HELD client,
First, we would like to know if we could use the LIS 2.0 without the SNMP
part, the part that we are really interested in is the HELD interface and
the DB. In fact we would like to populate database manually and don't be
binded to a specific localization approach such as SNMP.
Could it be achieved isolating some part of the code? So that the LIS
continue to work properly on HELD interface but independently from physical
interface.
Second, we noticed that the HELD client work as a Windows service, it suits
well when it work on the target, and could be considered as a service
enabler, but if we would like to use it on a different logical entity could
we wrap it in a jar file and use it as an isolated program? Is there
available some more doc about the building of the Java Client?
Last but not least, we are interested in using the client also on the LDP
interface, so is it able to take a uri and resolve it to gain the location
of a different target? This is the role in wich we would like to use it now,
and possibly as a program and not a service.

Thanks a lot

Alberto&Tommaso

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]

_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees