IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?

Michael Graff <michael_graff@isc.org> Tue, 11 March 2008 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53CB28C694; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.929
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.929 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.493, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXtvu6m0dbXN; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD9E28C6A6; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0F128C499 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHkTNrA63pyA for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from white.flame.org (white.flame.org [204.152.186.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7681728C101 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from white.flame.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181C2327A75; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.20.46] (dhcp-142e.ietf71.ietf.org [130.129.20.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15189327A5A; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
References: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155708508D@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com><200803111011.09512.michael_graff@isc.org> <BEF61FC5-9086-4EF8-94EF-342CB4DCF5A2@cisco.com> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C31661557085090@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Message-Id: <0D29A5E9-AC0B-43F2-A425-7D5CED73F0B7@isc.org>
From: Michael Graff <michael_graff@isc.org>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C31661557085090@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (4A102)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 4A102)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:49:00 -0400
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: "<71attendees@ietf.org>" <71attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1412340047=="
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

I still feel the experiment does not map into actual deployment  
practices. I doubt v4 is going to vanish and certainly just turning  
off routing in the hour long session only demonstrates one thing --  
that ipv4 routing breaks foe an hour.

Or are all dhcp v4 addresses going to expire then as well?  Otherwise  
the host has a v4 address and it can reasonably expect to he able to  
use it.

--Michael

On Mar 11, 2008, at 16:33, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip"  
<pbaker@verisign.com> wrote:

> The demonstration has proved something that many people knew but few  
> have been willing to accept.

_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email