Re: [71attendees] 2001:0df8:0:5::6 down?
Tony Tauber <ttauber@t-focus.com> Sat, 15 March 2008 04:03 UTC
Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4729A3A6D89; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6NjHLck2RHS; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B834328C0E6; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D5D3A6977 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ItHYhQwPHEeb for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E68D28C36C for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by QMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 11bu1Z00G17UAYkA10fJ00; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:59:33 +0000
Received: from obscure ([66.30.116.47]) by OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1G0E1Z00D11Rpka8Z00000; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:00:22 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=pzWnl9Wqn78A:10 a=9N2PkwiN7_PH6ySd7V0A:9 a=-69HPrttAUmmYWvnN4wA:7 a=4Ii4FtfoYMQcINzPCAijHl0iHikA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10
Received: by obscure (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:00:14 -0400
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:00:11 -0400
From: Tony Tauber <ttauber@t-focus.com>
To: Jim Martin <jim@wovensystems.com>
Message-ID: <20080315040011.GB4156@Zion>
References: <A5C8FFF2-B9CF-48EB-A623-08826A28DAF2@muada.com> <0E5DAFBA-09D6-4443-8078-6185DA8C1574@wovensystems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0E5DAFBA-09D6-4443-8078-6185DA8C1574@wovensystems.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] 2001:0df8:0:5::6 down?
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:54:09AM -0400, Jim Martin wrote: > We're seeing two network events at this time. The primary > "100G" link has gone down and the primary internal services Just to clarify what happened on the WAN side of things: Due to a mis-communication about the shutdown plans for the last day of the meeting, at 10:23 ET, the 100G service was deleted from the transport system. Since this was not done gracefully, traffic appears to have been black-holed for a few minutes until the BGP hold-timer expired and things failed over to the 10G backup wave on the same fiber. The NOC crew labored for several minutes more to deal with the sick DHCP server which, from some of things I was experiencing, had been getting a bit ill starting earlier in the morning from what I could see (periodic loss of DHCP service in the RRG room). I believe these events are completely coincidental. Tony > box (unix server) is having challenges. We've failed over to > the backup links and are working on either getting the > primary DNS/DHCP working or switched to backup servers. > > Sorry about the outage! > > - Jim > > On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:44 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > > Looks like the first IPv6 DNS resolver 2001:0df8:0:5::6 is down... > > > > I'll remove it from my settings now, but for future reference: it's > > nice to keep the nameservers running at least until the end of the > > last session. _______________________________________________ 71attendees mailing list 71attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees
- [71attendees] 2001:0df8:0:5::6 down? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [71attendees] 2001:0df8:0:5::6 down? Michael Graff
- Re: [71attendees] 2001:0df8:0:5::6 down? Bill Fenner
- Re: [71attendees] 2001:0df8:0:5::6 down? Jim Martin
- Re: [71attendees] 2001:0df8:0:5::6 down? Tony Tauber