Re: [71attendees] ietf71 wireless problems

Derek Atkins <warlord@pgp.com> Wed, 12 March 2008 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB0828C4D5; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.687, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bdbd3f4KcqZO; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437BE28C4AF; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C0728C5C3 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHo6B4rkIa3U for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pgpeng.com (mail.pgpeng.com [63.251.255.75]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566033A6A20 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [63.251.255.74] (account derek HELO keys.pgpeng.com) by pgpeng.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.7) with ESMTPSA id 2773759 for 71attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:00:35 -0700
Received: from pgpdev.ihtfp.org ([130.129.82.38]) by keys.pgpeng.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:48:00 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by keys.pgpeng.com on Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:48:00 -0700
Message-ID: <47D69E91.7020408@pgp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:00:33 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@pgp.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
References: <5805.1205160960@marajade.sandelman.ca> <5D325DF26B260F51B9F0BE96@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5D325DF26B260F51B9F0BE96@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:42:30 -0700
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org, mtd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] ietf71 wireless problems
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> --On Monday, March 10, 2008 10:56:00 AM -0400 Michael Richardson 
> <mcr@xelerance.com> wrote:
> 
>> I've never had problems with wireless, and I'm pretty kernel competent,
>> and the same cards were last used 2008-03-06.   I'm running debian
>> "GNU/Linux" etch with a custom 2.6.20.6 kernel.  I suspect that my cards
>> might need firmware upgrades to deal with some new-fangled mechanism, but
>> I am ignorant of what that might be.
> 
> It is worth noting that the Linux wireless extensions provide for at most 
> 64K-1 bytes of data in scan results (the length field is a 16-bit integer). 
> In the breakfast room around the time you were having this problem, the 
> scan data for the number of AP's visible was larger than 32K.  So if you 
> have an application which starts with a 4K buffer and then doubles it, as 
> NetworkManager does, then it ends up discovering 32K is not big enough, and 
> doubling it to.... zero!  A patched NM which instead jumps from 32K to 
> 64K-1 (the maximum size) is able to collect scan results and connect to the 
> network.

I've reported this to the networkmanager people.

> Note that this is in addition to other issues which have been discussed on 
> this thread, some of which have been resolved since Sunday.

-derek

-- 
Derek Atkins
Principal Software Engineer

PGP Corporation
4 Farragut Ave
Somerville, MA  02144

+1 617 623 3745 | warlord@pgp.com

PGP Corporation -- Rest Secured.(TM)

PGP Fingerprint:
0FEE 5EA1 FF22 E0C9 4FFE
631A 9232 FF93 1C80 1DB7

This email and any attachments thereto may contain private,
confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any
attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any
attachments thereto.

_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees