Re: [71attendees] IPv6 on a Windows XP?

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Wed, 12 March 2008 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABBE28C55B; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-pCrR4bp1ex; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F1728C7FD; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212A528C309 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nPKwW7RBeJm1 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CAC28C84E for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::112:21b:63ff:fe02:3c13] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:112:21b:63ff:fe02:3c13]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2CFON7V086529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:24:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <884EC9C0-AD39-499E-86F2-51731F9022E8@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: "George, Wes E IV [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
In-Reply-To: <9334B09E1D48E14F82C97DCA9330195B12AAB4F614@PDAWM04C.ad.sprint.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:24:40 -0400
References: <AC9BA58D-EDC7-4C7E-B417-6AFA78EB39A7@magma.ca> <E4CC50C4-F3B3-4DDF-BAAE-B3C42A348BF7@isoc.org> <CCDEE6C8-2760-489D-B3C3-73A0A8366554@ekabal.com> <2AD23050-3395-4480-84B5-B09AACADBC21@muada.com> <023E89A7-35DE-4EEB-B727-14AD390E1CE7@ekabal.com> <ED25C630-8172-47FC-90E4-200EDAF7C11A@verilan.com> <47D58F02.3070808@att.com> <47D59D74.5030801@nttv6.net> <D0602133-AF43-4661-B5B1-EAA0ADDD8584@muada.com> <47D5BF68.5040709@googlemail.com> <47D5C186.3090106@googlemail.com> <9334B09E1D48E14F82C97DCA9330195B12AAB4F614@PDAWM04C.ad.sprint.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: "71attendees@ietf.org" <71attendees@ietf.org>, Elwyn Davies <elwynd@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [71attendees] IPv6 on a Windows XP?
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On 12 mrt 2008, at 10:59, George, Wes E IV [NTK] wrote:

> Or failing that, perhaps someone with a box running some superior  
> version of software that understands that DNS is sorta critical to  
> proper IPv6 function [*nix, Leopard, *cough* mumble..vista] could  
> put a static 1918 address on their box to make their box available  
> on the network for us unfortunate souls to use for DNS without  
> actually needing IPv4 enabled on the wireless network itself?

Ok. I've set up the address 172.31.71.71 on my laptop to respond to  
DNS queries. So if you set up your interface with a suitably randomly  
chosen address in 172.31.0.0/16 with no default gateway and DNS server  
172.31.71.71 you can resolve names as long as I have my laptop open.  
For the next hour or so I'll be on the ietf-v6ONLY wlan, please test  
and let me know if it works.
_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees