IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [71attendees] Evening Social

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Wed, 12 March 2008 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CD73A6B32; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.414, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHKedmMnL1Zo; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0BA3A6AF4; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22273A69EC for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q+M-mRXvelqo for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89AF3A6935 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2008 10:46:40 -0700
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2CHkZ9v017595; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:46:35 -0700
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m2CHkXdr003027; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:46:33 GMT
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:44:08 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: "Alexander Clemm (alex)" <alex@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <85B2F271FDF6B949B3672BA5A7BB62FB055F4C82@xmb-sjc-236.amer.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0803121040510.1267@pita.cisco.com>
References: <010f01c883fe$f6581a40$5c158182@china.huawei.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0803120116480.6106@pita.cisco.com> <85B2F271FDF6B949B3672BA5A7BB62FB055F4C82@xmb-sjc-236.amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=885; t=1205343995; x=1206207995; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com; z=From:=20Ole=20Jacobsen=20<ole@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[71attendees]=20Evening=20Social |Sender:=20; bh=gt9jKF241fPg6kcOvSh8CLYARZWXDbdupIo0JMy9YVw=; b=bLvZtqnQL8qtP1EbGvD4bwADU3EaMODFPKznNITKN+Viw9MDw0JxbZA7mk dxyxWZVyxlBFIa7dKVz36eZLVoqrG8Hf3VQKp2xJXHlKpGGmzZC4HiCbNggX 7oB8jmVfQV;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=ole@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] Evening Social
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Alex,

Certainly, I would agree that having an even larger venue to 
accommodate everyone who wanted to attend would have been
nice, but given the circumstances, I think Comcast did the
right thing by limiting the number of tickets to what could
be accommodated in the space, --- which is what *I* meant by
"not too crowded".

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj


On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Alexander Clemm (alex) wrote:

> Glad to hear the social was nice.  I have to disagree on the "not too
> crowded" part though.  I missed it because of that - it was sold out
> weeks ago.  It would be nice to have enough tickets available that
> everyone who wanted to attend the social actually could.  
> --- Alex 
> 
_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email