Re: [71attendees] IPv6 on a Windows XP?

Roque Gagliano <roque@lacnic.net> Wed, 12 March 2008 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF04328C6D7; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.355, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O-+TkoOq56b4; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6C83A68C4; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D593A68C4 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXLzKlKxy7r1 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (lacnic.net.uy [200.40.228.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573903A686A for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.82.204] (unknown [130.129.82.204]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA9E30846D; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:13:03 -0300 (BRT)
Message-Id: <256CED79-3132-4608-8F4D-F26EA851CB8E@lacnic.net>
From: Roque Gagliano <roque@lacnic.net>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <884EC9C0-AD39-499E-86F2-51731F9022E8@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:42:49 -0400
References: <AC9BA58D-EDC7-4C7E-B417-6AFA78EB39A7@magma.ca> <E4CC50C4-F3B3-4DDF-BAAE-B3C42A348BF7@isoc.org> <CCDEE6C8-2760-489D-B3C3-73A0A8366554@ekabal.com> <2AD23050-3395-4480-84B5-B09AACADBC21@muada.com> <023E89A7-35DE-4EEB-B727-14AD390E1CE7@ekabal.com> <ED25C630-8172-47FC-90E4-200EDAF7C11A@verilan.com> <47D58F02.3070808@att.com> <47D59D74.5030801@nttv6.net> <D0602133-AF43-4661-B5B1-EAA0ADDD8584@muada.com> <47D5BF68.5040709@googlemail.com> <47D5C186.3090106@googlemail.com> <9334B09E1D48E14F82C97DCA9330195B12AAB4F614@PDAWM04C.ad.sprint.com> <884EC9C0-AD39-499E-86F2-51731F9022E8@muada.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail d51 (Leopard)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: roque@lacnic.net
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] IPv6 on a Windows XP?
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1334246375=="
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

so, if you use your own machine (127.0.0.1) as your dns server you  
could go arround the XP not resolving over IPv6 issue?

r.


On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 12 mrt 2008, at 10:59, George, Wes E IV [NTK] wrote:
>
>> Or failing that, perhaps someone with a box running some superior
>> version of software that understands that DNS is sorta critical to
>> proper IPv6 function [*nix, Leopard, *cough* mumble..vista] could
>> put a static 1918 address on their box to make their box available
>> on the network for us unfortunate souls to use for DNS without
>> actually needing IPv4 enabled on the wireless network itself?
>
> Ok. I've set up the address 172.31.71.71 on my laptop to respond to
> DNS queries. So if you set up your interface with a suitably randomly
> chosen address in 172.31.0.0/16 with no default gateway and DNS server
> 172.31.71.71 you can resolve names as long as I have my laptop open.
> For the next hour or so I'll be on the ietf-v6ONLY wlan, please test
> and let me know if it works.
> _______________________________________________
> 71attendees mailing list
> 71attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees

_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees