Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> Thu, 13 March 2008 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA1E3A6E55; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.389, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xp6UTgBFSRYd; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A700B3A6ABB; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87D23A6AC1 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aK+A-dB2O5Xm for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo02.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO02.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951623A6ABB for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([10.52.116.30]) by pacdcimo02.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id KP-GZL85.17859044; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:16:25 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) by PAOAKEXCSMTP01.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:16:25 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:10 -0400
Message-ID: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A66020413D76E@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...
Thread-Index: AciFPL3G4ffmuZtTQfG67WfSs0AntAACjJuG
References: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660203A5B212@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com> <6D604FA0-B7EE-4225-9F03-9E2A603A0866@voxeo.com> <1205434639.3774.2.camel@maine.pingtel.com> <BEA7C50E-3134-4065-A665-9C4D1BCC26E9@voxeo.com>
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: "Dan York" <dyork@voxeo.com>, "Dale Worley" <dworley@pingtel.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 20:16:25.0573 (UTC) FILETIME=[1CFF6150:01C88547]
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Gbps not GBps I suppose.  ;-)

________________________________

From: Dan York [mailto:dyork@voxeo.com]
Sent: Thu 3/13/2008 3:01 PM
To: Dale Worley
Cc: Livingood, Jason; 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...



On Mar 13, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Dale Worley wrote:


	On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:40 -0400, Dan York wrote:

		Given that 100 GBps divided by 1200 attendees equals about 80 MBps for
		EACH attendee, how exactly would you suggest we suck up all that
		bandwidth?  (And there's probably under 1,000 people left, so it more
		like 100+ MBps per attendee.)


	100 GB/sec?  How did we get a feeder like that into the building???


The slides in Comcast's host presentation at last night's plenary covered that.   Their utilization charts also showed we weren't using much of that bandwidth.  ;-) 

Dan


-- 
Dan York, CISSP, Director of Emerging Communication Technology
Office of the CTO    Voxeo Corporation     dyork@voxeo.com
Phone: +1-407-455-5859  Skype: danyork  http://www.voxeo.com <http://www.voxeo.com/> 
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com <http://blogs.voxeo.com/>   http://www.disruptivetelephony.com <http://www.disruptivetelephony.com/> 

Build voice applications based on open standards.
Find out how at http://www.voxeo.com/free





_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees