Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...

maxlarson.henry@fds.edu.ht Thu, 13 March 2008 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780513A67AD; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bnMMnpT+vUjx; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF2E3A6EF8; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA843A6CAD for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sd9RTDpWXa8C for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.snowroute.com (mail.snowroute.com [216.240.135.98]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05E53A67AD for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20613 invoked by uid 399); 13 Mar 2008 20:21:16 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPM; 13 Mar 2008 20:21:16 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1
Received: from 72-255-100-175.client.stsn.net (72-255-100-175.client.stsn.net [72.255.100.175]) by 216.240.135.98 (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:16 -0700
Message-ID: <20080313132116.jtkkmtpw71cgc4wo@216.240.135.98>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:16 -0700
From: maxlarson.henry@fds.edu.ht
To: 71attendees@ietf.org
References: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660203A5B212@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com> <6D604FA0-B7EE-4225-9F03-9E2A603A0866@voxeo.com> <1205434639.3774.2.camel@maine.pingtel.com> <BEA7C50E-3134-4065-A665-9C4D1BCC26E9@voxeo.com> <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A66020413D76E@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A66020413D76E@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.5)
Subject: Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Any URL to the cacti graphs (bandwidth utilization) ?

> Gbps not GBps I suppose.  ;-)
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Dan York [mailto:dyork@voxeo.com]
> Sent: Thu 3/13/2008 3:01 PM
> To: Dale Worley
> Cc: Livingood, Jason; 71attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...
>
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Dale Worley wrote:
>
>
> 	On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:40 -0400, Dan York wrote:
>
> 		Given that 100 GBps divided by 1200 attendees equals about 80 MBps for
> 		EACH attendee, how exactly would you suggest we suck up all that
> 		bandwidth?  (And there's probably under 1,000 people left, so it more
> 		like 100+ MBps per attendee.)
>
>
> 	100 GB/sec?  How did we get a feeder like that into the building???
>
>
> The slides in Comcast's host presentation at last night's plenary   
> covered that.   Their utilization charts also showed we weren't   
> using much of that bandwidth.  ;-)
>
> Dan
>
>
> --
> Dan York, CISSP, Director of Emerging Communication Technology
> Office of the CTO    Voxeo Corporation     dyork@voxeo.com
> Phone: +1-407-455-5859  Skype: danyork  http://www.voxeo.com   
> <http://www.voxeo.com/>
> Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com <http://blogs.voxeo.com/>     
> http://www.disruptivetelephony.com   
> <http://www.disruptivetelephony.com/>
>
> Build voice applications based on open standards.
> Find out how at http://www.voxeo.com/free
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 71attendees mailing list
> 71attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees
>



_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees