Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...

Michael Graff <michael_graff@isc.org> Thu, 13 March 2008 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E5028C23A; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.548, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b0ZC+R-gN8Oo; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD72E3A699E; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2E83A6CAD for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rKUq4C2bniiF for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from white.flame.org (white.flame.org [204.152.186.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842183A6B99 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from white.flame.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A004C327A75; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.20.46] (dhcp-142e.ietf71.ietf.org [130.129.20.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094DC327A72; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
References: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660203A5B212@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com> <6D604FA0-B7EE-4225-9F03-9E2A603A0866@voxeo.com> <1205434639.3774.2.camel@maine.pingtel.com> <BEA7C50E-3134-4065-A665-9C4D1BCC26E9@voxeo.com>
Message-Id: <CDC45B53-D556-441B-A4DF-62AB7BF228A4@isc.org>
From: Michael Graff <michael_graff@isc.org>
To: Dan York <dyork@voxeo.com>
In-Reply-To: <BEA7C50E-3134-4065-A665-9C4D1BCC26E9@voxeo.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (4A102)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 4A102)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:20:29 -0400
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: "71attendees@ietf.org" <71attendees@ietf.org>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>, Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com>
Subject: Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1242476682=="
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

It'd be hard since the wired switches in the terminal room while  
gigabit are seemingly chained. So the wired connections are limited to  
1% total from my poking around.

--Michael

On Mar 13, 2008, at 15:01, Dan York <dyork@voxeo.com> wrote:

>
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Dale Worley wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:40 -0400, Dan York wrote:
>>> Given that 100 GBps divided by 1200 attendees equals about 80 MBps  
>>> for
>>> EACH attendee, how exactly would you suggest we suck up all that
>>> bandwidth?  (And there's probably under 1,000 people left, so it  
>>> more
>>> like 100+ MBps per attendee.)
>>
>> 100 GB/sec?  How did we get a feeder like that into the building???
>
> The slides in Comcast's host presentation at last night's plenary  
> covered that.   Their utilization charts also showed we weren't  
> using much of that bandwidth.  ;-)
>
> Dan
>
> -- 
> Dan York, CISSP, Director of Emerging Communication Technology
> Office of the CTO    Voxeo Corporation     dyork@voxeo.com
> Phone: +1-407-455-5859  Skype: danyork  http://www.voxeo.com
> Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com  http://www.disruptivetelephony.com
>
> Build voice applications based on open standards.
> Find out how at http://www.voxeo.com/free
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 71attendees mailing list
> 71attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees
_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees