Re: [71attendees] [Geopriv] GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71

"Alberto Ballauri" <> Mon, 14 April 2008 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C453A6ED2; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3563A6E3F for <>; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXfWAHZaNNPc for <>; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E383A698D for <>; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id 2so149753ywt.49 for <>; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=N9DiQDLV1xbHtpgHJndRjMqFSUAKUNWJldcU9ycpw5o=; b=A2BLDr6eosGbuGSAUWt9nCatcrel8x2vtMCyNShGCufMNHi6VFbDSfRC6Wgehsy7H3xq6cm266YWeWPLITNG0iRTqiUCyW9ahjJIucB9lO/6rvws47ZV5hPQpU9wEvQeHPjssetTkJrbXYD+6/nvu8JF1dliMY8IfELScYaRBGw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qwWeEvuPbbGmbdWT1OBzYSf+dbecy8Ha4mlaSx+udiILq/ueY098N/ACjOLGGFpFYrdUGfPviUeY+IS4rmwKqzbijHyG0aUyZJGtGHxpIW7SKjQss+BywhakU96hLvfE1Np8dDWjcJSGS5I0YrJM7u00FGsPF82iQLsR+xpKhPA=
Received: by with SMTP id g17mr2851525yba.235.1207904310266; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:58:30 +0200
From: "Alberto Ballauri" <>
To: "Winterbottom, James" <>
In-Reply-To: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:43:00 -0700
Cc: GEOPRIV <>, Richard Barnes <>,
Subject: Re: [71attendees] [Geopriv] GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1832965699=="

Hi James,
We have some philosophical questions about the LIS and the HELD client,
First, we would like to know if we could use the LIS 2.0 without the SNMP
part, the part that we are really interested in is the HELD interface and
the DB. In fact we would like to populate database manually and don't be
binded to a specific localization approach such as SNMP.
Could it be achieved isolating some part of the code? So that the LIS
continue to work properly on HELD interface but independently from physical
Second, we noticed that the HELD client work as a Windows service, it suits
well when it work on the target, and could be considered as a service
enabler, but if we would like to use it on a different logical entity could
we wrap it in a jar file and use it as an isolated program? Is there
available some more doc about the building of the Java Client?
Last but not least, we are interested in using the client also on the LDP
interface, so is it able to take a uri and resolve it to gain the location
of a different target? This is the role in wich we would like to use it now,
and possibly as a program and not a service.

Thanks a lot

71attendees mailing list