Re: [71attendees] IPv6 on a Windows XP?

Elwyn Davies <elwynd@googlemail.com> Wed, 12 March 2008 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926C73A6E88; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.936
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.936 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.499, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pjlQVBMf6U8D; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D073A6F09; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D665C3A6E82 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4cJioTsVc9UN for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8DF3A6878 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so3926405mue.3 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7DAhxZjaAdvnSOBZdSrbem52y9NlJS+17zVTYhJvxv8=; b=NDLTB3XHjvb333iP6/OuliL+m3hNiq2CxlXaCDxlBPORrot7QH2vEPESSh3mHO4S2wt/xe77M+DVxRaegBuH1l6oo2o7eXbKR6/toMMHdUcaK+inJ9Va5R6kxIYmZCVyyyQSHY6e8dfj4dpp8Q6N5FwR+SMqurYLlUp17cs1yH0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TL1vt5kqBbLWFRjmTbjcv9ZeqIeUHnBImcRTbEecN/OM7rSv8keTWy+WkE4B0nEn38hcSJSx29GAFXWL9sbfsNuntrH5BVsXdsaqx02tV5CPLkjAFWGgNw2fxwfqSodF6Hg183IIHWzm7jlOLF0kbthUhaMQKWQ5Iv5h2N1xAzc=
Received: by 10.78.203.15 with SMTP id a15mr21721675hug.57.1205336486347; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.129.21.231? ( [130.129.21.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm6413655hud.43.2008.03.12.08.41.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <47D7FA6F.6050504@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:44:47 +0000
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "George, Wes E IV [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
References: <AC9BA58D-EDC7-4C7E-B417-6AFA78EB39A7@magma.ca> <E4CC50C4-F3B3-4DDF-BAAE-B3C42A348BF7@isoc.org> <CCDEE6C8-2760-489D-B3C3-73A0A8366554@ekabal.com> <2AD23050-3395-4480-84B5-B09AACADBC21@muada.com> <023E89A7-35DE-4EEB-B727-14AD390E1CE7@ekabal.com> <ED25C630-8172-47FC-90E4-200EDAF7C11A@verilan.com> <47D58F02.3070808@att.com> <47D59D74.5030801@nttv6.net> <D0602133-AF43-4661-B5B1-EAA0ADDD8584@muada.com> <47D5BF68.5040709@googlemail.com> <47D5C186.3090106@googlemail.com> <9334B09E1D48E14F82C97DCA9330195B12AAB4F614@PDAWM04C.ad.sprint.com>
In-Reply-To: <9334B09E1D48E14F82C97DCA9330195B12AAB4F614@PDAWM04C.ad.sprint.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:50:47 -0700
Cc: "71attendees@ietf.org" <71attendees@ietf.org>, Elwyn Davies <elwynd@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [71attendees] IPv6 on a Windows XP?
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

I fear I am still waiting on a fast fix from ISC (no promises, and 
looking at the place where it hapened I am not surprised)..
However I have had an idea on a minor change (after detailed study of 
Bind manual) that might result in the broken code path being avoided.
Just about to go and try it out.
/Elwyn




George, Wes E IV [NTK] wrote:
> The otherwise useful instructions on the wiki for installing bind as a workaround to reduce XP's currently end in "Result is a crash!  Bug reported... watch this space."
> Given that plenary (and therefore outage) is tonight and there's no fix as of yet for BIND workaround, how about enabling JUST DNS in IPv4 like was done at NANOG IPv4 outage, perhaps just on the local DNS servers being reported on DHCP?
>
> Or failing that, perhaps someone with a box running some superior version of software that understands that DNS is sorta critical to proper IPv6 function [*nix, Leopard, *cough* mumble..vista] could put a static 1918 address on their box to make their box available on the network for us unfortunate souls to use for DNS without actually needing IPv4 enabled on the wireless network itself?
>
> It should be possible to configure DNS to listen/respond on IPv4 and but respond with IPv6 addresses (AAAA), right?
>
> Even if BIND is fixed, we're not covering any new ground by proving that XP doesn't do IPv6 well, and those of us stuck with an XP box would still like to participate in the trial.
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:71attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Elwyn Davies
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:17 PM
> To: Elwyn Davies
> Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [71attendees] IPv6 on a Windows XP?
>
> Also there is a readme.1st file in the distribution with more info.
>
> /e
>
> Elwyn Davies wrote:
>   
>> File locations are apparently in C:\windows\system32\dns\etc\
>>
>> I found some info at
>> http://www.linode.com/forums/archive/o_t/t_1676/bind_9_on_windows_xp_u
>> sing_apache_server.html
>>
>>
>> We need a BIND expert for contents of files!
>>
>> /Elwyn
>>
>> Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>     
>>> On 10 mrt 2008, at 16:43, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> why not install bind on Windows XP ? :)
>>>> http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/view/?release=9.3.2-P2
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Can someone write up an explanation of how to do that?
>>>
>>> I installed BIND and set up the interface with DNS address 127.0.0.1
>>> but I'm at a loss about how to control BIND under XP... I can't find
>>> any information about where the named.conf goes and how to tell the
>>> server to reload it.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 71attendees mailing list
>>> 71attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees
>>>
>>>       
> _______________________________________________
> 71attendees mailing list
> 71attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 71attendees mailing list
> 71attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees
>   
_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees