Re: [71attendees] ietf71 wireless problems

Morgan Sackett <msackett@verilan.com> Mon, 10 March 2008 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AC73A6AEB; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mXtFLaYB0gE; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD063A6801; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7554E3A67E6; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPvb3yUbzE+t; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.verilan.com (machete.verilan.com [70.99.232.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3113A69C6; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-0160.ietf71.ietf.org ([130.129.1.96]) (authenticated user msackett@verilan.com) by mail.verilan.com (Kerio MailServer 6.5.0) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:21:54 -0700
Message-Id: <B7FC9D2A-CD26-438F-BD44-E1C84EB6EEB0@verilan.com>
From: Morgan Sackett <msackett@verilan.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <9654C724-319C-4377-A698-4D3187323D0C@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:22:12 -0400
References: <5805.1205160960@marajade.sandelman.ca> <9654C724-319C-4377-A698-4D3187323D0C@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org, mtd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] ietf71 wireless problems
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Hi all,

It does in fact appear that the new APs we have are having issues with  
802.11b clients.  We are in the process of deploying a fix for this,  
so please hang tight.

We do in fact have N on the network, but only in the 5ghz range.   
802.11b/g clients should not be specifically affected by N.  If you  
are having issues with it, please let us know by stopping by the  
helpdesk in the Terminal Room, or by sending email to noc@ietf71.ietf.org 
.

Morgan


On Mar 10, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 10 mrt 2008, at 10:56, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>> I'm having layer-2 problems with the wireless.
>> (I will have to go plugin at the terminal room to send this)
>> I tried most of Sunday to get online, but I never succeeded.  It is
>> no better this morning.
>> I am sending this in the hope that I am not alone. Many people can
>> online a bit, but get very poor performance, or are unable to stay on
>> very long.  My case seems pathological.
>
>> It looks like there are just too many APs to me.  My poor card  
>> doesn't
>> stay associated to any one of them long enough to get any data
>> through.
>
>> I am using an external orinoco 802.11b card "Lucent Technologies
>> GOLD",
>> but I have similar experiences with cisco Aironet cards. (Yes, this
>> is a
>> card from an ietf 40-something meeting).
>
> It looks like the network is 802.11n (it tells me I'm connected at 130
> Mbps), and in my (granted, limited) experience with 802.11n gear is
> that unlike 802.11g, it has no compunction about about stepping on
> 802.11b—hard.
>
> Perhaps things would work better for last century's wifi cards if 2.4
> GHz stuff is set to 802.11g. Or maybe not...
>
> Iljitsch
> _______________________________________________
> 71attendees mailing list
> 71attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees





_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees