Re: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Tue, 11 March 2008 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A09728C1F8; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id an6NypxluwSz; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EC53A686C; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0AA3A699A for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkhyp0c3bibo for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492463A68B7 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::112:21b:63ff:fe02:3c13] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:112:21b:63ff:fe02:3c13]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2BL4p3X068926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:04:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <02862BAA-CFB7-415E-9A57-BFEC33893963@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: 71attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <546A5633-580D-42B7-B87F-50A26F4D31B8@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:05:08 -0400
References: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155708508D@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <546A5633-580D-42B7-B87F-50A26F4D31B8@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Subject: Re: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On 11 mrt 2008, at 16:32, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

>> 2) iChat and Adium were both unable to connect to my gmail identity
>> server so I was unable to connect to any chat room whatsoever.

> Which is not strange because Google doesn't do IPv6 at this time. But
> if you want you can work around this:

> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg50560.html

> Adium should work well, iChat will only work if there is still an IPv4
> address on the system somewhere, which will be the case if you have
> Parallels installed.

Turns out that this works differently whether you have IPv4 turned off  
or you have it turned on but there just isn't any. In the latter case,  
iChat has no problems.

If you really want to cheat, use sequoia.muada.com port 80 as a proxy  
and you can reach the IPv4 web with only IPv6 connectivity.

However, that didn't work for me with the Parallels fake interfaces.  
You can easily remove those but you probably want to do that in a  
separate "location" so they're not really gone.
_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees