Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Sat, 02 August 2008 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FE13A698C; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ECE3A659B for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UuR+B40kFSbm for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D503A698C for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,297,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="60806193"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2008 18:26:43 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m72IQhI0027544; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:26:43 -0700
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m72IQhCr028197; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:26:43 GMT
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:26:42 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: John C Klensin <john+ietf@jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCA2979E1D86FA0BBEA067@p3.JCK.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0808021119510.26658@pita.cisco.com>
References: <C4B78D93.77300%jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <p0624060dc4b9400efa84@[172.16.14.74]> <CABCA2979E1D86FA0BBEA067@p3.JCK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=956; t=1217701603; x=1218565603; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com; z=From:=20Ole=20Jacobsen=20<ole@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[72attendees]=20Dietary=20restrictions |Sender:=20; bh=D0G5g7FUW9ne7Y1ZWuINCJopDFtA9gtiHWn8dEPcsT4=; b=0hl+OqzLhJ41o3/NjCRGsstzH91nGT82sVI8Mvpc5VlA+ZePuTNLi2jufC PDLvPN7viv2FHSiJx/FXn6jci377inw3R8jQd1ne3w+G7iNwBR+Db/B/UCQg My314zHdFh;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=ole@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
One thing that isn't completely clear to me is if this "problem" is unique to Ireland. Is it really reasonable to expect a hotel in, say, Minneapolis to be more clued in about this than one in Dublin? By "reasonable" I don't mean "fair" -- in an ideal world the full range of options should be available. I mean "would you just expect them to know X ?" Now, when we go to Hiroshima there probably WILL be some issues that the local caterers simply do not comprehend and if someone would like to compile a list of questions/concerns/requirements we (the IAOC in cooperation with the local host) can certainly do our best to pass the information along and, where possible, find acceptale solutions. We have more than a year to work on this. Ole Ole J. Jacobsen Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal Cisco Systems Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628 E-mail: ole@cisco.com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj _______________________________________________ 72attendees mailing list 72attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
- [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dave Crocker
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Yoav Nir
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dan Wing
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Even, Roni
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Randall Gellens
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Ted Lemon
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions John C Klensin
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions john+ietf
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions john+ietf