IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [72attendees] Not a complaint

Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net> Tue, 29 July 2008 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB7F3A698B; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0665D3A6927 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id alEX96qd9GDU for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hiroshima.bogus.com (hiroshima.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9092C3A698B for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hiroshima.bogus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hiroshima.bogus.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6TGBDSb011212; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:11:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from llynch@civil-tongue.net)
Received: from localhost (llynch@localhost) by hiroshima.bogus.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6TGBDFG011209; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:11:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from llynch@civil-tongue.net)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:11:13 -0700
From: Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net>
X-X-Sender: llynch@hiroshima.bogus.com
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <BEF70836-D1EE-4162-BD1B-810FD69ADEA5@muada.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0807290910140.10951@hiroshima.bogus.com>
References: <BEF70836-D1EE-4162-BD1B-810FD69ADEA5@muada.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY="Apple-Mail-5-669767738"
Content-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0807290910141.10951@hiroshima.bogus.com>
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Not a complaint
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> The network wasn't working so well for me in the BEHAVE session:
>
> --- sequoia.muada.com ping6 statistics ---
> 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 96.774/551.194/2062.626 ms
>
> Apparently my Mac has scaled back its transmission speed somewhat, see 
> picture.
>
> However, on the ietf-a network things are much better at 104 Mbps on channel 
> 60.

please open a ticket by either going to:

http://meeting.ietf.org

or by sending email to: help@meeting.ietf.org


thanks

> Iljitsch
>


      
          
_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees



      
          
_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees



      
    

    

      
        
      
    


 




             


      

        
      

          
    
 

    


 

    



    






    

    


    
  
    
  

      
v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email