Re: [72attendees] SIP blocked in hotel rooms ....

Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com> Tue, 29 July 2008 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648DC28C26B; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32E828C26B for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dCIZ3JUU7ncF for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pingtel.com (host117.155.212.198.conversent.net [155.212.198.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1148928C25E for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ssh.pingtel.com [10.1.20.8]) by mail.pingtel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9471A6C018 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:24:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com>
To: 72attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <488E50FB.5050004@cisco.com>
References: <488E50FB.5050004@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:24:30 -0400
Message-Id: <1217327070.3851.16.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Subject: Re: [72attendees] SIP blocked in hotel rooms ....
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:06 -0600, Luca Martini wrote:
> Can we get SIP ( port 5060 udp/tcp ) unblocked in our hotel rooms ?

SIP is working for me.  (I'm in 31xx.)  Although I'm registering to a
PBX through their Ingate Siparator, which does far-end NAT compensation.

Perhaps this is a consequence of what someone observed, that the outside
IP addresses of TCP connections aren't always the same, and your NAT
compensation is defeated?

Dale


_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees