Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (wasRe: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Tue, 29 July 2008 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C0928C106; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AB33A69FB for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.491, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1vXbkeWBnkk6 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8343A6991 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s73602 ([130.129.55.2]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKp8S-1KNmQU0QVy-0005da; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:27:32 -0400
Message-ID: <00ea01c8f165$d3e99270$fff410ac@china.huawei.com>
From: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
To: <72attendees@ietf.org>
References: <C4B41B20.76FCE%jonne.soininen@nsn.com><94A3C924-DB32-43B1-B9F5-66C54EA32926@muada.com> <1217326884.3851.12.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:28:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19YWwex5o8Q0hBz29rAV34wh4VpBRi3C30SsbN /Xa3ql7f+MXtsW3z4i5lbDv6cKsoQ3uFPi7ieytblr/MDcX7c2 lnvhnEBfn1s50HucJAGBpjjJXFZbTYFYQ906trtTRo=
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (wasRe: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

> (Actually, given the huge level of volunteers and sponsor support, we
> have the right to a considerable amount of stuff that we have *not* paid
> for -- and we should be thankful.)

Having just walked through the NOC this morning, I'm glad *I* wasn't paying 
salaries for the quality and quantity of the volunteers that are missing 
IETF working group meetings to figure out networking problems...

:-)

I won't post again on this, but I also have to say that the people who have 
been saying "thank you" to secretariat and support people who have been 
jumping on every problem when it's reported have been awesome.

Thanks,

Spencer 


_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees