IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [72attendees] Meeting arrangements and costs (was: Re: Clarifying Host Responsibilities )

Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com> Mon, 11 August 2008 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526C53A6BFB; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329E93A6C62 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.73
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hXH32QgWQQwc for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pingtel.com (host117.155.212.198.conversent.net [155.212.198.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778563A67EF for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ssh.pingtel.com [10.1.20.8]) by mail.pingtel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC8F6C018 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:35:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com>
To: 72attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2659E0096D8BCA5C34A1E9F8@p3.JCK.COM>
References: <C4B41B20.76FCE%jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <94A3C924-DB32-43B1-B9F5-66C54EA32926@muada.com> <08E2EAD8-D4D6-41CF-B290-AF389F9C3A06@kurtis.pp.se> <p06240612c4ba114f84ca@[172.16.14.74]> <6EBF07737F3818449841A452@p3.JCK.COM> <63452C63-A2D2-4920-B56E-B2E13899C98A@kurtis.pp.se> <2659E0096D8BCA5C34A1E9F8@p3.JCK.COM>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:35:08 -0400
Message-Id: <1218476108.13270.24.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Meeting arrangements and costs (was: Re: Clarifying Host Responsibilities )
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 07:55 -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> (ii) when the IAOC advertises free
> Internet access in rooms, there is some limited IETF obligation
> to understand that "Internet access" implies connections that
> work, deliver addresses, route packets, etc., not just plug in
> and to provide an interface with the hotel about that...  or to
> say "well, there are Internet connections in the rooms, and they
> are free, but maybe they won't work".   

I've always taken "free in-room Internet" to mean "you get the hotel's
in-room Internet service, for free" which implies "you may have a hard
time getting it to work".  But perhaps that should be stated more
clearly.

Dale


_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email