Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (was Re: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Wed, 30 July 2008 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D29C3A68B6; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E501D3A68B6 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0CFVJEQCQN55 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9DF3A68A2 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,279,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="133491828"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2008 13:25:42 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6UDPgeG014447; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:25:42 -0700
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UDPfBj022205; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:25:41 GMT
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <48905D65.303@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0807300613090.17168@pita.cisco.com>
References: <C4B41B20.76FCE%jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <94A3C924-DB32-43B1-B9F5-66C54EA32926@muada.com> <1217326884.3851.12.camel@victoria.pingtel.com> <488F4098.1040106@dcrocker.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0807290926120.17270@pita.cisco.com> <48905D65.303@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=709; t=1217424342; x=1218288342; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com; z=From:=20Ole=20Jacobsen=20<ole@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[72attendees]=20Clarifying=20Host=20Res ponsibilities=20(was=20Re=3A=20Guestroom=0A=20Network=20not= 20under=20NOC=20Control) |Sender:=20; bh=tCnMl2AVRbpr5Xy0BHPUPylBBnhGJb3de01PrSRCikQ=; b=oQQhId6x6ne67GHIBouO2ihe4ZYX9tklxJKFqoLvpEWIdjWEiTBi7/P041 ykTjsQOgsjnBHfvyZoaW0shX499kgt7WGv0bJm+6azC91FApQWfbXOHnxjby U4yXwdojn3;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=ole@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (was Re: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Dave,

De-coupling the two issues is a fine idea on paper and in my 
experience almost unworkable in practice. Hosts DO want some
say in where we meet and they DO want to be near a place where
they can provide "local" support (if only from a remote office).

I would be wonderful if we had a pool of money from lots of
vendors that simply took care of all costs and logistics and
we then just get to pick the venue. Oh, wait, there is such
a pool, it's called "Organizational Membership in ISOC".

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees