Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (was Re: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)

Lloyd Wood <lwood@cisco.com> Tue, 29 July 2008 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844BA3A6937; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007193A6937 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MEhUUMeIUDa3 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9D3A6897 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,271,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="15668595"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2008 08:58:00 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6T8vxc0001175; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:57:59 +0200
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6T8vxcG021968; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:57:59 GMT
Received: from lwood-wxp02.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp240.cisco.com [10.61.64.240]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id m6T8vxI12279; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:57:59 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200807290857.m6T8vxI12279@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:57:56 +0100
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, "Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
From: Lloyd Wood <lwood@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <94A3C924-DB32-43B1-B9F5-66C54EA32926@muada.com>
References: <C4B41B20.76FCE%jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <94A3C924-DB32-43B1-B9F5-66C54EA32926@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=628; t=1217321879; x=1218185879; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lwood@cisco.com; z=From:=20Lloyd=20Wood=20<lwood@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[72attendees]=20Clarifying=20Host=20Res ponsibilities=20(was=20Re=3A=0A=20=20Guestroom=20Network=20n ot=20under=20NOC=20Control) |Sender:=20; bh=/gudPKX1LTQdkXhjHpyUQGAqEcmK17vUFxJ+8lExXR0=; b=tH8xM5rd3DI37xckk6g3VLcriLsf5xhafNM0VfbhD2w7Sw2xvBV/Fx5iFY BW/4AW86VfrJgCkO4BSaQ9HJuYK+P4LTDtCU9Ln8bEffGu8bJvrL0o2JnPk0 J3ndrw+vrj;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=lwood@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (was Re: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

+1 

At Monday 28/07/2008 23:11 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

>I find this a rather condescending attitude, especially as the powers  
>that be have deemed it necessary to select a venue that pretty much  
>precludes any choice on the part of the participants.
>
>I'm sure the people from the host, the regular volunteers, and maybe  
>even the hotel people, are working quite hard to get everything  
>working as well as can be expected. (My 60% packet loss has cleared up  
>nicely, thanks for that.) But that doesn't mean we don't get to point  
>out shortcomings for fear of someone taking it personally.

_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees