Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 00:47 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF293A68C5;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6DE3A68C5
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ps4FQI6O4ZsW for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DE63A68B4
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com
[10.160.244.31])
by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id
mAL0liDx023275
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:45 +0200
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by
vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:42 +0200
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by
vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:42 +0200
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by
vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:42 +0200
Received: from danira-pool05470.americas.nokia.com
(danira-pool05470.americas.nokia.com [10.241.54.70])
by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id
mAL0ldlc027622
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:40 +0200
Message-Id: <DC5BB921-5538-4BAE-B433-43C10EEAE80E@nokia.com>
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:47:39 -0600
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 00:47:42.0580 (UTC)
FILETIME=[C2F28B40:01C94B72]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bob.hinden@nokia.com
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
>> > > Is this thread still going? Heck, just hold it on a boat. Change the > IETF conference into an IETF cruise in international waters. > Just to be clear, unless the boat is an aircraft carrier, people will still need a visa to fly to where the ship is docked. Bob _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley