Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Eric Gray" <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0CE3A687E;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:41:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AF93A687E;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:41:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id lOR3T68v-XbZ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81C53A6808;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se
[138.85.77.50])
by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAIGhc7O004667;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:43:38 -0600
Received: from eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se ([138.85.77.21]) by
eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:41:06 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:41:04 -0600
Message-ID: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF04284E6B@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <A8EBCE2E-B035-4216-A1B1-247C3B3973B9@frobbit.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is USA
qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclJmtKBldz+jqX2TU+BSuV63FKWqAAATmlg
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn><3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net><20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov>
<A8EBCE2E-B035-4216-A1B1-247C3B3973B9@frobbit.se>
From: "Eric Gray" <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <patrik@frobbit.se>, <qdang@nist.gov>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 16:41:06.0671 (UTC)
FILETIME=[7400DFF0:01C9499C]
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA
qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Yeah, I agree. Having 100 million people show up at a Hilton hotel for a meeting would likely have us in litigation for decades. Of course, it would be interesting to try to determine how large an area would be covered by hotel bookings for so many attendees... -- Eric Gray Principal Engineer Ericsson > -----Original Message----- > From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:29 AM > To: qdang@nist.gov > Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor > 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > On 18 nov 2008, at 09.59, qdang@nist.gov wrote: > > > I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many > > people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in > > the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will > > be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA > next year > > alone. > > Having 100 million people paying the conference fee for the > next IETF > in San Francisco, just so they could get a 1-entry conference visa > (which is what India offers at no cost for the IGF in Hyderabad), > would radically change the economical situation for the IETF. > > Patrik > > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda