Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 01:34 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFCC3A6834;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:34:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709DD3A6834
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:34:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id U86kmZFtM3O4 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76983A6808
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:34:32 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,648,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="108472164"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195])
by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2008 01:34:31 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238])
by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAM1YVfw018548;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:34:31 -0800
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199])
by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAM1YVde007966;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:34:31 GMT
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:33:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811211732020.18335@pita.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
<a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com>
<3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
<96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=633; t=1227317671; x=1228181671;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Ole=20Jacobsen=20<ole@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[73attendees]=20Is=20USA=20qualified=20
for=202.3=20of=0A=20draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection
-criteria? |Sender:=20;
bh=v7CM9gYrU+8yzclCD3plUsczESkSF0nKdChGyktiZ+k=;
b=kfINtm4Lj2sYJFel41VdpZdtrIqdtFdAWJTqTMASoyFnMDO8K8b3yTobUH
YxwxLrMJqmbmJzLiOeaWjlYwd2HEB2ENc7BRtBk+EVtSTKqyVBbrH6B80UE2
UvGfeN53jP;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=ole@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 21 nov 2008, at 11:17, William Herrin wrote: > > >Unfortunately, aside from the general instructions on the web site, > >they won't tell you. Security through obscurity. ;) > > Maybe it would be more helpful to complain to the Chinese government, they'll > have more incentive to solve this. What makes you think this has ANYTHING to do with the Chinese government??? The delay or non-response is purely a matter for the US Embassy in Beijing unless I am missing something important. That is, the Chinese government has no involvement whatsoever. Oke _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley