Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us> Fri, 21 November 2008 00:29 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D3C3A6801;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:29:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5573A6873
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:29:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.866,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, GB_I_INVITATION=-2,
GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id MU6qay0O7noY for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.26])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F273A67F0
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so293691eyd.31
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:29:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender
:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references
:x-google-sender-auth;
bh=urH+OU2daObE/d25DfVUVJzy/54APEPNvE98MYd94eQ=;
b=nxeHvuxXQIDvzfQAw+dOF7mOL/YsL/ahgtBHVdoTnTvlLPG9HO2YKTFq1GVfqvLkST
fmyjomMnUZ1GvSA0EBtcTAOZ0SwcUZMrW3Y87SxJwLGgP+QsGtJLrAfT2xqdWwOT3OJV
lesh6tVoI/cr+AI5LzFzjgPcHhROvFYzzg/2E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=TXcQg/tP4ZmRR220QTyIPvDygH0EQGRiHFmArS9xRMYYLwlsCI/oiJjOxiR7I56IbI
immweM/si+00diCr3mbqvFeR7SSz3MRDBLTG7j7uHwHPSpfmZkbal+Duo8gjMPoURyYG
boxcFvK5FsPHDiwozylNjG4Aj5XREC3Q9cVOA=
Received: by 10.210.139.15 with SMTP id m15mr2495829ebd.118.1227227353947;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:29:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.210.125.14 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:29:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:29:13 -0600
From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 01808fcf11010d61
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:24 AM, YAO <healthyao@gmail.com> wrote: > Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could > be disallowed entry Is this thread still going? Heck, just hold it on a boat. Change the IETF conference into an IETF cruise in international waters. In all seriousness though, the State Department is a bureaucracy and like any bureaucracy it likes things that file into neatly prepared categories. When an attendee presents a letter of invitation from the IETF of Fremont, CA 94538, I imagine the first thing the investigator does is go to http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/list.html and put in "Internet Engineering Task Force." Failing to find anything, he might try the same at http://rct.doj.ca.gov/MyLicenseVerification/Search.aspx?facility=Y or another site like it. Finding nothing there, he might possibly go to http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=ai1epe.1.1 and search for IETF since the logo on the invitation letter claims to be a registered trademark. This will lead him to something called the "IETF Trust" of Reston Virginia. So, he may got to http://www.scc.virginia.gov/clk/bussrch.aspx but that won't find anything IETF. Since the meeting is held in Minnesota, he may try http://www.sos.state.mn.us/home/index.asp?page=792 as well, but he still won't find anything. Next the investigator may pick up the phone, call Wanda Lo and ask what the heck this IETF thing is, but by then you've raised three Red Flags: an organization that doesn't appear to legally exist at the given address, has a trademarked registered on the other side of the country to an entity that also doesn't appear to exist and is allegedly holding a conference in still another part of the country where it doesn't seem to legally exist. To an investigator who doesn't know "Internet Engineering Task Force" from "George Walker Elementary School Little League," that means your application goes into the "we'll get back to you" queue. I could be dead wrong. I've never worked in immigration and I don't personally know anyone who has. But that's my SWAG. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley