Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Song Haibin <melodysong@huawei.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 07:06 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119363A67F8;
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:06:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECB63A67F8;
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:06:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.060,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 2MgwL6neNeyf; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB133A67D8;
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12])
by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KAI00GBZOZPHY@szxga04-in.huawei.com>; Tue,
18 Nov 2008 15:04:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24])
by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KAI008XFOZPCP@szxga04-in.huawei.com>; Tue,
18 Nov 2008 15:04:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from s64081 ([10.164.12.12])
by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KAI00MF3OZOXJ@szxml04-in.huawei.com>; Tue,
18 Nov 2008 15:04:37 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:04:36 +0800
From: Song Haibin <melodysong@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
To: 'YAO' <healthyao@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <01a401c9494b$eae43910$0c0ca40a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-index: AclJRoG9CJan08YhQleqv2NjVb1sqwAA69iA
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3
ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
My visa application is still under the check in the Shanghai USA embassy since I submitted it in September 17th. What can I say? Best Regards, Song Haibin Email: melodysong@huawei.com Skype: alexsonghw >-----Original Message----- >From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On >Behalf Of YAO >Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:25 PM >To: ietf@ietf.org >Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org >Subject: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 >ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > > >according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteri >a-04#section-2.3 > >which said " > >2.3. Freedom of Participation > > Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could > be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for > all participants. >" > >My question is :" > >Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria >as IETF Meeting Venue ?" > >It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when ietf >is held in USA this time or other times >_______________________________________________ >73attendees mailing list >73attendees@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley