Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@huawei.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 00:47 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14AD3A68C5;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128A33A68B4
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553,
RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id WD3vOPiB9yFQ for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCAB3A67F0
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12])
by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KAN00C0ORI80Y@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for
73attendees@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:46:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.6])
by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KAN00DV4RI8R8@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for
73attendees@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:46:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([130.129.29.124])
by szxml02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0KAN001QNRI665@szxml02-in.huawei.com> for
73attendees@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:46:56 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:46:53 +0100
From: Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
Message-id: <492604FD.8090306@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3
of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hhelvoort@huawei.com
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Bill, You wrote: > Is this thread still going? Heck, just hold it on a boat. Change the > IETF conference into an IETF cruise in international waters. And where would the boat pick up the participants without requiring visa's. It takes a containership 60 days to make a trip around the world landing at major ports. A cruiseship would take longer. Cheers, Huub. -- ================================================================ Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else... _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley