Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E7E3A6821;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:38:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B7F3A6AB7
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:40:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.867,
BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Jk-IER9j2rH4 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0534F3A6AB1
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost)
by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1L2M8L-000FuN-Ve; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:40:30 -0500
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:40:30 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: YAO <healthyao@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <A42C3908F70181B4FE002719@klensin-asus.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:38:30 -0800
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3
of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
--On Tuesday, 18 November, 2008 14:24 +0800 YAO <healthyao@gmail.com> wrote: > according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-sele > ction-criteria-04#section-2.3 > > which said " > > 2.3. Freedom of Participation > > Meetings should not be held in countries where some > attendees could be disallowed entry or where freedom of > speech is not guaranteed for all participants. (cross-posting removed) (1) to the very limited extent to which anything can be done from this end, you need to request invitation letters (which may or may not help, but can't hurt) and ask for help as early as possible, not wait until after the meeting has started. It might not have made any difference -- indeed, it probably would not have -- but we will never know. (2) While it probably won't be immediate, some of us hope that things will get better in this area, as well as some others, after January 20. john _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley