IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4643A6A9E; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2602E3A6A9E for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jsFh-C8Bj0IL for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB053A6978 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1118100fga.41 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=W28nfYrIKkkRP2N+yq49Fd7dD6c2t4W/5T/FNtOAW4s=; b=p6VE3rqcJrWv44wVggWqSHYcc0Y7Lsq02sczb+vowKnjAEZPo2rmqwO7n1KEUHGhdV A3a8ie8jXXktBcxX8fO+6XrM3+py8FIVzIKdfPEZ0GeuRzaERoLiTAc6tm/nYjFX8lFM xnhEAz3OCOvx27eFYRCagNsytbsn3kZZMgjSk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=H4NfS51inldusMW81oH6NCbVvyKkbyKVS/CcuLw5loNXQRE6gK0BBEuBLVNw/1GWDd JsiApk/XN4cBEpqijKv7wVnZ8YLJqGBlxnjyAXpaMwG1/AN7wDnDdQeJGDWTt1CURfp/ 2CVTgbOWeby/kTvyscykexHtpVdIWNNMbuWEE=
Received: by 10.181.141.18 with SMTP id t18mr499258bkn.203.1227380018282; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.153.1 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811221053n7b3b4ad6oc4cdc28e37b3ffc7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:53:38 -0500
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Ole Jacobsen" <ole@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811211732020.18335@pita.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net> <20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org> <B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com> <20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org> <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk> <3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com> <a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com> <3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com> <96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811211732020.18335@pita.cisco.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0124638415=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

The Chinese state dept and the US embassy in China spend much of their time
discussing precisely this sort of issue. That is their job.

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> > On 21 nov 2008, at 11:17, William Herrin wrote:
> >
> > >Unfortunately, aside from the general instructions on the web site,
> > >they won't tell you. Security through obscurity. ;)
> >
> > Maybe it would be more helpful to complain to the Chinese government,
> they'll
> > have more incentive to solve this.
>
> What makes you think this has ANYTHING to do with the Chinese
> government???
>
> The delay or non-response is purely a matter for the US Embassy in
> Beijing unless I am missing something important. That is, the Chinese
> government has no involvement whatsoever.
>
> Oke
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>



-- 
Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
http://dotcrimemanifesto.com

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email